Conclusive: Global Distribution of Rockefeller-Funded Anti-Fertility Vaccine Coordinated by WHO

Editing Note:

Essential article on covert population reduction conducted by the Rockefeller Foundation since the 1960's.

For more information, please see End Game, linked at the end of this article.

Jurriaan Maessen
Thursday, August 5, 2010

In its 1968 yearly report, the Rockefeller Foundation acknowledged funding the development of so-called “anti-fertility vaccines” and their implementation on a mass-scale. From page 51 onward we read:

“(…) several types of drugs are known to diminish male fertility, but those that have been tested have serious problems of toxicity. Very little work is in progress on immunological methods, such as vaccines, to reduce fertility, and much more research is required if a solution is to be found here.

The possibility of using vaccines to reduce male fertility was something that needed to be investigated further, according to the Rockefeller Foundation, because both the oral pill and the IUD were not suitable for mass-scale distribution:

“We are faced with the danger that within a few years these two “modern” methods, for which such high hopes have been held, will in fact turn out to be impracticable on a mass scale.”

The possibility of administrating hormone preparations to reduce fertility was also mentioned, although- states the report- they have been known to “cause bleeding problems, which may limit their usefulness.”

“A semipermanent or renewable subcutaneous implant of these hormones has been suggested, but whether or not the same difficulties would result has not been determined.”

Saying that research thus-far had been too low-grade to produce any substantial results, the report was adamant:

“The Foundation will endeavour to assist in filling this important gap in several ways:

1- “Seeking out or encouraging the development of, and providing partial support to, a few centres of excellence in universities and research institutions in the United States and abroad in which the methods and points of view of molecular biology are teamed with the more traditional approaches of histology, embryology,and endocrinology in research pertinent to development of fertility control methods;”

2- “Supporting research of individual investigators, oriented toward development of contraceptive methods or of basic information on human reproduction relevant to such developments;”

3- “Encouraging, by making research funds available, as well as by other means, established and beginning investigators to turn their attention to aspects of research in reproductive biology that have implications for human fertility and its control;”

4- “Encouraging more biology and biochemistry students to elect careers in reproductive biology and human fertility control, through support of research and teaching programs in departments of zoology, biology, and biochemistry.”

The list goes on and on. Motivation for these activities, according to the RF?

“There are an estimated five million women among America’s poverty and near-poverty groups who need birth control service (…). The unchecked fertility of the indigent does much to perpetuate poverty, undereducation, and underemployment, not only in urban slums, but also in depressed rural areas.”

It wasn’t long before all the Foundation’s efforts began to have effect. In its annual report of 1988, The RF was happy to report the progress made by the Foundation’s Population Division in the field of anti-fertility vaccines:

“India’s National Institute of Immunology successfully completed in 1988 the first phase of trials with three versions of an anti-fertility vaccine for women. Sponsored by the government of India and supported by the Foundation, the trials established that with each of the tested vaccines, at least one year of protection against pregnancy could be expected, based on the levels of antibodies formed in response to the immunization schedule.”

In its 1997 review of anti-fertility vaccines, Indian based International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology didn’t forget to acknowledge its main benefactor:

“The work on LHRH and HCG vaccines was supported by research grants of The Rockefeller Foundation, (…).”

In the 1990s the work on anti-fertility vaccines went in overdrive, especially in third-world nations, as did the funding provided by the deep pockets of the Rockefeller Foundation. At the same time, the target-population of the globalists- women- began to stir uncomfortably with all this out-in-the-open talk of population reduction and vaccines as a means to achieve it.

Betsy Hartman, Director of the Population and Development Program at Hampshire College, Massachusetts and “someone who believes strongly in women’s right to safe, voluntary birth control and abortion”, is no supporter of the anti-fertility vaccine, as brought into being by the Rockefeller Foundation. She explains in her essay Population control in the new world order:

“Although one vaccine has been tested on only 180 women in India, it is being billed there as ‘safe, devoid of any side effects and completely reversible’. The scientific community knows very well that such assertions are false – for instance, many questions still remain about the vaccine’s long-term impact on the immune system and menstrual cycle. There is also evidence on film of women being denied information about the vaccine in clinical trials. Nevertheless, the vaccine is being prepared for large-scale use.”

The Women’s Global Network for Reproductive Rights based in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, quoted “a leading contraceptive researcher as saying:

“Immunological birth control methods will be an ‘antigenic weapon’ against the reproductive process, which left unchecked, threatens to swamp the world.”

Animal rights activist ms. Sonya Ghosh also expressed concerns about the Rockefeller-funded anti-fertility vaccine and its implementation:

“Instead of giving individual women more options to prevent pregnancy and protect against AIDs and sexually transmitted diseases, the anti fertility vaccine is designed to be easily administered to large numbers of women using the least resources. If administered to illiterate populations the issues of user control and informed consent are further cause for concern.”

To avoid such debates, the Foundation has in the last couple of decades consorted to its long-practised and highly successful methods of either outright lying through its teeth or using deceptive language to hide the fact that it continues to work tirelessly toward its long-stated mission. If you think the RF and others have abandoned their anti-fertility efforts with the help of vaccines, think again or read this article.

CNN's" A factory of one's own"

Forward by Tony Cartalucci: If the PC and the Internet have undermined the ability of the ruling elite to control communication and information, then personal manufacturing will end their ability to control manufacturing, distribution, and control over the very creation of technology. Read on about the "Personal Manufacturing" revolution...

From CNN's "A Factory of One's Own."

By Jeffrey M. O'Brien, Fortune senior editor

According to MIT's Neil Gershenfeld, the digital revolution is over, and the good guys won. The next big change will be about manufacturing. Anyone with a PC will be able to build anything just by hitting 'print.'

(Fortune Magazine) -- Imagine a machine with the ability to manufacture anything. Now imagine that machine in your living room. What would you build first? Would you start a business? Would you ever buy anything retail again? According to MIT physicist Neil Gershenfeld, it's not too early to think about these questions, because that machine, which he calls a personal fabricator, is not so far off - or so far-fetched - as you might think.

Read the rest of this article here.

Please also check out the innovative work of the Reprap project, open source personal 3D printing, and the MakerBot here.

Asian Economic Community by 2015

The Tentacles of Globalism Descend into Southeast Asia

By Tony Cartalucci

According to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) by 2015 the nations of Thailand, Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore and Vietnam will be integrated into a single market and manufacturing base of 600 million people. This is outlined in ASEAN's "Asian Economic Community Blueprint" published in 2008.

This call was reaffirmed during the 42nd ASEAN Economic Ministers' Meeting this week in Vietnam. Southeast Asian integration will consist of "harmonizing" everything from regulation standards concerning capital flow and finance (including removing equity holding limitations for foreigners), agriculture and forestry, to intellectual property rights, infrastructure development, legal structure regarding communication, and transportation (including a "ASEAN Highway Network .")

The current ASEAN secretary general, Surin Pitsuwan of Thailand, leads the current efforts to implement the AEC 2015 blueprint. Pitsuwan sits as a Member of the Board of Trustees of the globalist Asian Foundation, funded by amongst many others, Boeing, Chevron, The Ford Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Halliburton, Raytheon Company, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. He joined the Rockefeller Foundation's Board of Trustees in 2010. He also sat on the Council on Foreign Relations' (CFR) International Advisory Board as of 2009, and even gave a talk before the CFR on May 14, 2008, regarding a "one unified Southeast Asia."

To say Surin Pitsuwan is a "classically trained" globalists is an understatement. However, despite his background and the stated intentions of the ASEAN AEC, progress has been admittedly slow, so slow that some in the Council on Foreign Relations are "skeptical that ASEAN will be quite so central to the future of East Asian regionalism."

Surin is quoted in his CFR talk as saying in regards to establishing free-trade with blocs like the US and EU that "economies like Thailand, like Malaysia, like Indonesia, Philippines have found it very, very difficult to concede this [free trade], concede that because of the vested interest inside. And we cannot just ignore them because they have been the basis of our growth for the last 30, 40 years."

Despite the delicate balancing act Surin Pitsuwan appears to be performing between eager globalists and reluctant regional nationalistic power brokers, ASEAN itself is a means for globalists to integrate Asia into their greater one world government. It serves as a forum to institute standardizations and regulations that will cripple local industry and invite in foreign corporations to dominate and take over markets as limits on foreign equity holdings are relaxed.

One such globalist corporation eager for the promises of ASEAN's AEC is Monsanto. Utilizing ASEAN's Food Security Conference, Monsanto and fellow biotechnology company, Chatham House Corporate Member, Syngenta called for regulations and the protection of intellectual property rights along with the introduction of their genetically modified, herbicide and insect resistant crops.

But like ASEAN's stated goals for a unified Southeast Asia, Monsanto and Syngenta's goal of dominating big agricultural industry in the region has been slow and hampered by activism and nationalistic resistance.

In 1999, Monsanto teamed up with Mechai Viravaidya's Population and Community Development Association (PDA), of Thailand to introduce biotechnology to Thailand's Northeastern farmers. Activities included handing out free buckets of Monsanto herbicides and pesticides and demonstrating land leveling technology. Local NGO's came out in protest as part of an ongoing effort to prevent Monsanto's goal of introducing and commercializing GMO crops in Thailand. The project was abandoned. One has to wonder why Monsanto, purveyor of controversial and potentially hazardous GMO crops would team up with the PDA, an organization that specializes in family planning and whose founder is not only credited with reducing the population growth of Thailand from 3.2% a year in the 1970s to 1.2% in the mid-'90s, to 0.7% now, but also received the 2007 Gates Award from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

While Cambodia's "permanent" Prime Minster Hun Sen, has literally put his nation up for sale to foreign investors, 45% of which has been sold right out from under the Cambodian people, not all Southeast Asian nations are as eager to let foreigners in. Thailand currently restricts foreign equity holdings at 49%, has banned GM crops, and has powerful, deeply rooted families unwilling to open up Thailand's markets and compete with the West's mega-corporations. ASEAN's slow progress of convincing these holdouts to accept globalism and regional consolidation seems to have opened the door to more extreme measures by the globalists.

Whether it is the International Crisis Group, stacked top to bottom with CFR members working in tandem with Chatham House major corporate member Amsterdam & Peroff to provide legal, lobbying, and propaganda support for globalist operative Thaksin Shinwatra and his mobs of Khmer Rouge-esque protesters to purge Thailand of its old moneyed families, or the mainstream media's dead silence on the atrocities taking place in Cambodia, or the US military's defense of training the very Cambodian army units that have been evicting people from their land after selling it to foreign investors - it seems that the globalists have decided the insidious and incremental creep will not work as smoothly as it did for the European Union.

Southeast Asia will most likely labor through the next few years somewhere between the European Union' relatively smooth transition into a super-national state, and the Middle East's still bloody and uncertain push into regional consolidation. But if people can be made aware on a global level of what globalization really is, perhaps ASEAN's dragging of feet can spare it the failures and pitfalls the EU, UK and the US are suffering now because of their interdependency - interdependency which seems only to distribute the failures of the elite amongst the people, and consolidate the wealth of the people into elite's hands.

Below, Surin Pitsuwan performs his delicate balancing act during an SPF interview.

Ground Zero Mosque, Part II

1. Editing Note: "Imam" Faisal Abdul Rauf's official American Society of Muslim Advancement's "audit" can be found here, This information was obtained by a simple Google search: annual report. Apperently this is beyond the abilities of Fox News, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and the myriad of pundits who claim the funding of the Cordoba Initiative is "mysterious."

2. The Ford Foundation has been removed from the list of ASMA supporters, though it indirectly funds it via grants to the Ms. Foundation, Rockefeller Philanthropy, and the Global Fund for Women, as well as funding the Council on Foreign Relations itself, direclty. Further information can be found here, at Ford Foundation's Grant Database.

Update: September 5, 2010. Fox News of News Corporation is also on the corporate membership list of the Council on Foreign Relations, and Rupert Murdoch of News Corporation is an individual member of the CFR as well. Fox News has been leading the fake-right narrative on this "Ground Zero Mosque" in the mainstream media.

The Anatomy of a Globalist Propaganda Operation.

By Tony Cartalucci

As the drums for war with Iran beat louder, so does the din of the globalist's "clash of civilizations."

Taking center stage of the "clash" is the now infamous, "Ground Zero Mosque."

It was previously reported that the "Ground Zero Mosque," officially known as the Cordoba House, is the vision of "Imam" Faisal Abdul Rauf, a member of the Council on Foreign Relation's Religious Advisory Committee.

It was also reported that the dual organizations Rauf is using to promote and fund his activities are the Cordoba Initiative and the American Society for Muslim Advancement (ASMA). ASMA had listed several large globalist foundations as its supporters including the Carnegie Corporation of New York, Rockefeller Brothers, Rockefeller Philanthropy, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.

It was established that the Council on Foreign Relations' corporate membership consists of various and notorious war profiteering corporations, including KBR and Veritas Capital Fund's DynCorp, the top 2 profiteers of the Iraq war by 2007.

The Council on Foreign Relations individual membership consists of notorious "Neo-Conservatives," including Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Abrams, Vin Weber, John R. Bolton, General Colin L. Powell, Condoleezza Rice, and Robert Zoellick. It also consists of General David H. Petraeus, General Stanley McCrystal, Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Timothy F. Geithner, Paul Volcker, Henry M. Paulson, Jr. who are currently working under (or over) President Obama's administration.

So when one considers that war mongering, war profiteering corporations, and establishment politicians from both sides of the aisle are members of a single organization, funding the divisive "Ground Zero Mosque," one can't help but feel it is nothing more than a stunt, a hoax, foisted upon the American public in order to continue their lucrative, endless wars while allowing them to wrestle away whatever is left of our Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Researching deeper into the organizations funding "Imam" Faisal Abdul Rauf's ASMA organization, one sees this apparent conspiracy in absolute definitive terms.

The Money Men

Let's take a look at the complete list of "supporters" that appears on Rauf's ASMA website.

The Carnegie Corporation of New York

The Carnegie Corporation of New York is chaired by CFR member Thomas H. Kean. According to the Carnegie Corporation's own website, Mr. Kean "was tapped by President George W. Bush to head The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks on the United States (the "9/11 Commission")..."

Other CFR members populating the Carnegie Corporation of New York include:

Richard Beattie: Chairman of the global law firm Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Ralph J. Cicerone: "president of the National Academy of Sciences, is an atmospheric scientist whose research in atmospheric chemistry and climate change has involved him in shaping science and environmental policy at the highest levels nationally and internationally."
Susan Hockfield: president of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Norman Pearlstine: Chief Content Officer of Bloomberg, formally a senior advisor to the Carlyle Group’s telecommunications and media group.
Thomas Pickering: Vice chairman of Hills & Company (Carla Hills of the CFR's consultant firm)
and until 2006 was Senior Vice President of Boeing International Relations (Boeing is a corporate member of the CFR.)
James D. Wolfensohn: former president of the World Bank, Chairman of Citi International Advisory Board (Citi is a CFR corporate member), founder of the Brookings Institute's Wolfensohn Center, and "served both as Chairman of the Finance Committee and as Director of the Rockefeller Foundation and of the Population Council, and as member of the Board of Rockefeller University."

Former director of multiple CFR corporate members Helene L. Kaplan, former Clinton Secretary of State Warren Christopher, and former FCC chairman Newton N. Minow are the Carnegie Corporation's three honorary trustees, and all three are also members of the CFR.

The Rockefellers

The Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors consist of senior staff members who "offer an average of 20 years each in grantmaking experience with major foundations, both domestic and international, including the Ford Foundation, the Levi-Strauss Foundation, the New York Community Trust, and the John A. Hartford Foundation."

Judy Belk for instance, had previously worked for the Ms. Foundation, also listed above as supporters of "Imam" Faisal Abdul Rauf's ASMA organization.
Chris Page: was a former program officer at the Ford Foundation

The Rockefeller Brothers Fund is chaired by CFR member Stephen B. Heintz.

Nicholas Burns: CFR member, Former ambassador, National Security Council member under Clinton
Miranda Kaiser: CFR member, deputy counsel of the Independent Inquiry Committee into the United Nations Oil-for-Food Programme
Vali Nasr: "Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and Fellow at the Dubai Initiative at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University"
Timothy O'Neil: Senior strategy officer at Goldman Sachs & Co, which of course, is a "founding" corporate member of the CFR.
Steven C. Rockefeller: Chaired the Earth Charter International Drafting Committee whose preamble is an open declaration for world government and reads:

"We stand at a critical moment in Earth's history, a time when humanity must choose its future. As the world becomes increasingly interdependent and fragile, the future at once holds great peril and great promise. To move forward we must recognize that in the midst of a magnificent diversity of cultures and life forms we are one human family and one Earth community with a common destiny. We must join together to bring forth a sustainable global society founded on respect for nature, universal human rights, economic justice, and a culture of peace. Towards this end, it is imperative that we, the peoples of Earth, declare our responsibility to one another, to the greater community of life, and to future generations. "

He is also a CFR member.

Advisory Trustees for the Rockefeller Brothers Fund include David Rockefeller, Rockefeller patriarch, and CFR member, Jonathan F. Fanton CFR member, Robert B. Oxnam, also a CFR member.

Global Fund for Women

According to the Global Fund for Women's annual report which can be downloaded in .pdf format here, this organization has received over 10 years of financial support from the Rockefeller Foundation. Ms. Foundation (which is also a supporter of Rauf's ASMA organization,) the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Google, Goldman Sachs Philanthropy Fund, Citigroup Foundation, Morgan Stanley, are just a few donors on the extremely long list of globalist, CFR listed corporations.

The Ms. Foundation

Founded by CIA operative Gloria Steinem, the Ms. Foundation, according to its annual report found under their publication section here, is funded by the Ford Foundation (over $1 million USD), Goldman Sachs, Citi Group, Citi Foundation, Time Warner, amongst many others.

Hunt Alternatives Fund

Founder and president Swanne Hunt sits on the Council of Foreign Relations. Within the Hunt Alternatives Fund is the Prime Movers fellowship program that serves as a nexus for "social movements."

Primary Movers listed on Hunt Alternatives Fund's website includes:

Van Jones: former adviser to President Obama, member of the Center for American Progress think tank.
Daisy Khan: co-founder with Rauf of the above mentioned ASMA.
Jim Wallis: CFR Religious Advisory Committee member, Jim Wallis is also currently a member of President Obama's White House Office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships. He publishes Sojourners which has printed several articles in defense and in support of Faisal Abdul Rauf's "Ground Zero Mosque:"

Who Wins When the U.S. Restricts Religious Freedom?
In support of the Cordoba House (Part 1)
The Implications of Calling Cordoba House a "Mosque"

One Council, Two Lies, One Goal

CFR Sends its Proponents

Jim Wallis' publication, Sojourners, provides for us the "tolerant" narrative of this false paradigm.

"Islam did not attack America on Sept. 11 — terrorists did."

"A mosque isn’t being proposed for Ground Zero; more accurately, the Cordoba House is a community center, to be built at 51 Park Place (multiple blocks away from Ground Zero) by an organization currently located across the street at 45 Park Place that has been serving that community for years."

"Thankfully, America has a Bill of Rights that protects against such erosions of liberty."

And if you believe the "official" account of 9/11, and believe this is a genuine Muslim group seeking "outreach" this all sounds reasonable.

When you see the CFR funding the Cordoba House, up one side and down the other and don't believe the government's official account of 9/11, your suspicious are raised by such commentary.

CFR Sends its Detractors

Counter to CFR member Jim Wallis' "tolerant" narrative, comes fellow CFR member and a senior adviser to the Coalition in Iraq, Dan Senor's "intolerant" narrative, published in the Wall Street Journal. The article was also posted on the CFR's official website,

"However, while we will continue to stand with you and your right to proceed with this project, we see no reason why it must necessarily be located so close to the site of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks."

"Those attacks, as you well know, were committed in the name of Islam. We applaud and thank every Muslim throughout the world who has rejected and denounced this association. But the fact remains that in the minds of many who are swayed by the most radical interpretations of Islam, the Cordoba House will not be seen as a center for peace and reconciliation. It will rather be celebrated as a Muslim monument erected on the site of a great Muslim "military" victory—a milestone on the path to the further spread of Islam throughout the world. "

"Our deeper concern is what effect Cordoba House would have on the families of 9/11 victims, survivors of and first responders to the attacks, New Yorkers in general, and all Americans."

Here, Senor claims there are "many" Muslims who will not only see the Cordoba House as a monument of victory (for an attack Muslims didn't commit), but are also partaking in an implied campaign of world domination to "spread" Islam. This is also very believable, assuming one believes the government's official narrative of 9/11 and the imminent threat presented by "radical" Islam.

This paradigm was reinforced by the "Obsession: Radical Islam's War against the West" DVD. In a rare mass mailing that saw the propaganda piece arrive at millions of American homes from the mysterious "Clarion Fund," Americans received their Fox News approved primer on "radical" Islam. Interviewees included, professed Zionists, journalists writing for the Jerusalem Post, lawyers specializing in anti-Semitism, a former Nazi, a former PLO member, and a spy for the UK police.

In an almost cartoonish, intelligence insulting manner, "Obsession" proposes to us that Islam is the great threat of our time and that the "War on Terror" waged by the likes of President George Bush and his inner circle of Neo-Cons, is our only hope of saving Western civilization. We take a look at Bush's war mongering inner circle who lurked within William Kristol's Project for a New American Century think tank before Bush became president in 2000:

Elliott Abrams, CFR member, PNAC signatory.
Eliot Cohen, CFR member, PNAC signatory.
Lewis Libby, CFR member, PNAC signatory
Richard Cheney, CFR member, PNAC signatory
Vin Weber, CFR member, PNAC signatory
Paul Wolfowitz, CFR member, PNAC signatory
Douglas Feith, CFR member, PNAC signatory
John Bolton, CFR member, PNAC signatory
John McCain, CFR member, PNAC signatory
Daniel Pipes, CFR member, PNAC signatory
Robert Zoellick, CFR member, PNAC signatory
Robert Kagan, CFR member, PNAC signatory
Francis Fukuyama, CFR member, PNAC signatory

PNAC 2.0: Foreign Policy Initiative

Other notable Neo-Conservatives that can be found on the CFR are the members of William Kristol's reinvented PNAC called the Foreign Policy Initiative.

Robert Kagan is on the Initiative’s board of directors and a CFR member – Jamie Fly is executive director of the Initiative, also a CFR member - Ellen Bork, Initiative director, also a CFR member - Dan Senor sits on the board of directors and is also, a CFR member.

The FPI has come out decisively against the Ground Zero Mosque. In a piece titled "Mayor Bloomberg is Wrong on the Ground Zero mosque, says FPI Director William Kristol," Kristol starts by saying,

"Last Tuesday, standing in front of the Statue of Liberty, New York mayor Michael Bloomberg spoke on the subject of the proposed mosque at Ground Zero. His remarks will be read with curiosity by future generations of Americans, who will look back in astonishment at the self-deluding pieties and self-destructive dogmas that are held onto, at once smugly and desperately, by today’s liberal elites. Our liberation from those dogmas, and from those elites, is underway across the nation."

A man surrounded by CFR globalist elites, who are funding both the "conservative" and "liberal" agenda at once is already framing this, at the expense of his respect for his reader's intelligence as a liberal vs. conservative false paradigm. He continues...

"As is the way of contemporary liberals, Bloomberg spoke at a very high level of abstraction. He appealed to the principle of religious toleration, while never mentioning the actual imam who is responsible for and would control the planned Ground Zero mosque. To name Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf might invite a consideration of his background, funding, and intentions. Do Rauf and his backers believe in the principles underlying the “inspiring symbol of liberty” that greets immigrants to the United States and before which Bloomberg stood?"

Perhaps Mr. Kristol should have his own board of directors ask the good Imam where his funding comes from at the next CFR meeting? Or perhaps Mr. Kristol needs the American people who he claims to speak for, to remind him we are not as stupid as he thinks we are. That we are not incapable of clicking on the "About Us" button on their public, official websites, from the CFR, to the Cordoba Initiative, and all the way back to fake right-wing conservatives like Kristol.

And so we come full circle, we began with the CFR fully funding Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf's ASMA organization, looked extensively at how each foundation was either funded by globalist CFR members, or directly controlled by CFR members. We saw how the Ground Zero Mosque received praise from CFR fake left-wingers like Jim Wallis of Sojourner, then how fake CFR right-wingers like Dan Senor and his FPI colleague Bill Kristol lead the debate with intolerance, anger, and zeal on the opposing side.

When you consider the corporate membership of the Council on Foreign Relations is making trillions off of the endless war on terror, they themselves started and now refuse to end, when you consider Mr. Rockefeller's Earth Charter Initiative's open declaration for global government, and how every arm of the CFR above and below reaches for globalization and you see the "war on terror" hand delivering all of the above - you should be suspicious.

But when you see the Council on Foreign Relations funding a controversial mosque and protesting against it simultaneously, there is only one conclusion to be made:

This "War on Terror" is 100% absolute, utter theater. The very people making trillions from the wars are now purposefully generating hatred, division and animosity to continue their lucrative genocide and continue their designs of world domination they openly write about. They bought the land for Fiasal Abdul Rauf, they fielded his supporters and detractors, who are then parroted verbatim by the media pundits they own, and the blogging shills they pay to infiltrate the alternative media with. Their "clash of civilizations" materializes before their very eyes based on our shear ignorance and emotional knee-jerk reactions.

Worst of all, our "elected" politicians, from the President to the Senators all are fully aware of who and what the CFR is. Many of them are members and if they are not, their advisers are.

Here is the final passage from William Kristol's "Mayor Bloomberg is Wrong on the Ground Zero mosque, says FPI Director William Kristol" and realize Kristol who represents the inner most circle of Neo-Conservatives in America, all of whom are CFR members, just wrote an entire article condemning Mayor Bloomberg's comments regarding the Ground Zero Mosque, with the mayor himself, also being a CFR member:

"The conclusion of Bloomberg’s speech was odd: “Political controversies come and go, but our values and our traditions endure—and there is no neighborhood in this City that is off limits to God’s love and mercy, as the religious leaders here with us can attest.” Do the rest of us need Bloomberg’s hand-picked religious leaders to tell us that there are no limits to God’s love and mercy? We do doubt that encouraging this mosque to be built is an appropriate expression of respect for God’s love and mercy for those who were killed almost nine years ago. And we would note that no expression of New Yorkers’ love and gratitude for the victims of September 11 has yet been built at the site of Ground Zero during Mayor Bloomberg’s tenure.

It is likely, we believe, that civic pressure will cause the mosque to be moved elsewhere—Bloomberg’s lecture notwithstanding. But if Bloomberg were to have his way, it’s worth noting that he would presumably attend a dedication of Feisal Abdul Rauf’s mosque at Ground Zero before he would attend a dedication of a proper memorial to those who died there.

Contemporary liberalism means building a mosque rather than a memorial at Ground Zero—and telling your fellow citizens to shut up about it."

What Kristol leaves you with is a choice to make, left or right. He himself questioned Faisal Abdul Rauf's funding, but where did he provide the answer? Surely a man with such connections could find out easier than I did...

The danger when confronted with a news story, especially a controversial one, by not asking yourself the important questions, is being forever trapped in a false paradigm. A cage not of steel, but of your own ignorance. One within which you may send your son off to die because you fell for absolute utter theater put on by a single organization with soulless scum posing in different masks on opposing sides. Always click "About Us" and never settle on a conclusion until you have all the facts. Knowledge is power; that is not a cliche that is literally the difference between freedom and slavery, life and death.


There is a conspiracy to dominate the planet. It is not one of Christians, not Muslims, not Jews, not even Zionists, but rather godless nihilistic megalomaniacs. The globalists play each and every angle, whatever will work in a certain geological location, upon a certain cultural paradigm. The goal of meticulously documenting the CFR connections above to the foundations funding "Imam" Faisal Abdul Rauf, was to illustrate how large the CFR is. It illustrates how interconnected the CFR is with other think tanks and foundations.

Upon the CFR's 2009 roster, you can find authors of what you read in the bookstore, in the pages of Newsweek and Time magazine, the commentators you see in news editorials and the expert commentators brought onto mainstream media news shows.

The CFR has a sister organization in the United Kingdom called the Chatham House. It is equally as large, backed by the world's largest corporations, and infiltrating your daily news with their nefarious interjections.

Amsterdam & Peroff
Barclays Capital
BHP Billiton International Services Ltd
Booz & Company
British American Tobacco
City of London
Clifford Chance LLP
Coca-Cola Great Britain
Control Risks
Economist, The
Eni S.p.A.
Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Goldman Sachs International
Herbert Smith LLP
Home Office
HSBC Holdings plc
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales
Japan Bank for International Cooperation
JICA UK Office
Kuwait Petroleum Corporation
MediCapital Bank plc
Merck & Co Inc
Mitsubishi Corporation
Nomura International plc
Oliver Wyman
Rio Tinto plc
Royal Bank of Scotland
Saudi Petroleum Overseas Ltd
Standard Chartered Bank
The European Azerbaijan Society
Thomson Reuters
Towers Watson
United States of America, Embassy of the
Vodafone Group
Warburg Pincus

Here, the Huffington Post allots a whole page to the "editorials" of Robert Amsterdam who is grooming another globalist operative, Thaksin Shinwatra who is leading, not "radical" Muslims, but this time a "people's revolution" in Thailand, on behalf of foreign investors. You will notice Robert Amsterdam's firm, Amsterdam & Peroff on the above list, second from top.

Definitely, we can see the same globalists, partnering with any personality that will have them, exploiting them along whatever paradigm will work at the moment. While the CFR uses "Imam" Faisal Abdul Rauf in America to divide along theology and Constitutional rights, the Chatham House and International Crisis Group is using Thaksin Shinwara to divide Thailand along economic class.

Establishment Media Pushes Brain Eating Vaccines

Paul Joseph Watson
Tuesday, August 3, 2010

The establishment media and the scientific dictatorship are promoting brain-eating vaccines that virtually lobotomize people and rewire their brains into a state of subservient compliance so that their natural instinct to get angry and rebel against the tyranny being imposed upon them is neutered and sterilized.

“Academics say they are close to developing the first vaccine for stress – a single jab that would help us relax without slowing down,” reports the Daily Mail.

Dr Robert Sapolsky, professor of neuroscience at Stanford University in California, says the vaccine is intended to impose a state of “focused calm” by altering brain chemistry.

The new research dovetails with proposals to add lithium to the water supply in order to treat “mood disorders”.

People globally are already being bombarded with sodium fluoride, a cancer causing neurotoxin, through the water supply, toothpaste, and many foods.

The first occurrence of fluoridated drinking water on Earth was found in Germany’s Nazi prison camps. The Gestapo had little concern about fluoride’s supposed effect on children’s teeth; their alleged reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to sterilize humans and force the people in their concentration camps into calm submission.

Infowars is promoting a new viral Google search term in order to attract much needed attention to this grave issue.

Search for “brain eating vaccines” and by elevating this term to the top of Google Trends, we can reach millions of new people who would otherwise have never come across this information.

Find the whole article on Prison Planet here.

BBC's "Stark warnings over Thai emergency laws"

Foward by Tony Cartalucci

The International Crisis Group is a US based "think tank" with some of the highest level globalists making up its membership.

Kenneth Adelman: Former US Ambassador to the UN, former lobbyist for Thaksin Shinawtra, the very man behind Thailand's "red shirt" protesters, the riots, and the ongoing political instability in the country.
Wesley Clark: Council on Foreign Relations member, former NATO supreme allied commander.
Carla Hills; Council on Foreign Relations member, Trilateral Commission member, signatory of the CFR's "Building a North American Community" aka the North American Union.
George Soros: globalist extraordinaire, a personal and corporate member of the CFR.
Fidel Ramos: Former President of the Philippines, Carlyle Group member.
Richard Armitage: Council on Foreign Relations member, signatory of the Project for a New American Century,
Zbigniew Brzezinski: CFR member, Bilderberg member, Trilateral Commission member/director/co-founder.

This think tank is hardly an objective organization - as everything these men and women do in the CFR and Trilateral Commission revolve around the geopolitical manipulation of foreign nations and the extra-legal production of US policy. Kenneth Adelman's involvement alone derides any legitimacy ICG might have on the topic, as he is the former lobbyist of the "red shirt's" leader.

Nearly all of the ICG's "recommendations" are also, verbatim, Thaksin's ultimatums given to the government via his new pet lobbyist, Robert Amsterdam.
Samyos Phruksakasemsuk, author of "Voice of Taksin." Samyos claims that the curbs on media are unreasonable and will force people underground. Of course, BBC makes no mention that Samyos's publication regularly featured death threats, calls to arms, and violent rhetoric that served as the blueprint for the violence that struck the city in April and May of 2010. Let's take a look at a few selections from Samyos' "Voice of Taksin" and see if this sort of hatred would be protected under any nation's "freedom of speech" provisions.

Translations can be found here.

Obviously calls to kill people, burn down people's property, and otherwise destroy society at the expense of 65 million people's rights isn't protected under freedom of speech. Typically, if you threaten to kill someone or destroy someone's property, this is called "conspiracy to commit a felony/conspiracy to commit murder." Not only do you have no right to threaten others, you also face serious jail time for doing so.

4. And finally, not even a month went by after this article was published with its "stark warnings" that two bombs went off in the city, claiming the life of one, and seriously injuring 9 others.

With a state of emergency extended, there have been suggestions that underground groups are getting prepared to use violence in Thailand.

The details are unspecific and hard to verify, but pose a stark warning for the government to act with caution.

A "red-shirt" security guard during the protest in Bangkok city centre, who has been in hiding since the army ended the demonstrations six weeks ago, has told the BBC he has been asked to join an organisation training to make bombs.

"We have been approached by two or three groups who used violence during the protest and shot at soldiers," he said, over the telephone from an unknown location.

"They said they are operating underground and would like us to join them but we are waiting for now.

"I understand from the discussions among these groups that there will be bombs. There are 30 to 40 people being trained in how to use petrol to make a big explosion."

Most protesters on the streets of Bangkok from March to May were peaceful, but there was a violent element responsible for firing grenades and automatic weapons at soldiers and police.

There have been a number of small blasts in the last week, but it is not known who is responsible. A grenade attack on an empty gas storage vessel in Bangkok is suspected to have been carried out by serving troops.

'No more instability'

Fears over security was the reason given by the Thai government for extending a State of Emergency in Bangkok and 18 other provinces for another three months.

Five provinces previously under the Emergency Decree, which gives security forces extra powers, had the laws relaxed.

A recent report from the International Crisis Group recommended the government remove these laws, described as "draconian", across the whole country in order to prevent forcing opposition underground.

Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva: "We need to restore order now"

It also called on protest leaders to have charges of terrorism dropped in order to achieve effective reconciliation.

Ahead of the cabinet decision, Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva told the BBC: "There will be a gradual lifting of the state of emergency in the various provinces.

"We need to restore order, the last thing we need now is a repeat of violence or clashes," he said.

"We will do all we can to get back to normalcy as soon as possible. The last thing the country wants now is more instability."

The account from the unnamed former red-shirt security worker suggests the government has reason to worry about the threat of violence, but Thitinan Pongsudhirak, director of the Institute of Security and International Studies at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok, disagrees.

"The continued imposition of the State of Emergency is alarming, it violates basic civil liberties," he said, speaking before the cabinet decision.

"It is being used increasingly as a political instrument of the government and the powers-that-be in Thailand to maintain control, to try to put a lid on the opposition, to stifle dissent.

"It will not allow space for dissent, disagreements and grievances to be expressed. If those exist they will be pent up and when they have a chance to come back they will be much more furious than we have seen."


Opposition media has also been silenced in much of north-eastern Thailand, where the red-shirt movement originates.

It is here the former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra focused his spending efforts and gained popular support while in power.

Samyos Phruksakasemsuk says the media curbs force critics underground

He is seen as a hero by many poorer people who gained from his populist policies of cheap healthcare and credit, but treated as a manipulative and corrupt leader by his opponents, who removed him from power in a coup in 2006. He has been convicted of abuse of power while in office.

Thaksin is blamed by the government for funding and encouraging the anti-government rallies in Bangkok and the efforts to force the current prime minister to stand down.

Many of the community radio and TV stations which were platforms for the anti-government red-shirt message have been shut down by the government and there is anger among people there who feel they have been silenced.

Samyos Phruksakasemsuk is an activist who produced a magazine called Voice of Thaksin, which was also banned, and has recently brought out a new publication called Red Power.

He expects it to be banned as well, but warned the government: "People feel repressed as they can't voice their opinions openly, so the fear is they will go underground and there'll be more violence."

Mr Abhisit said more space would be provided for opposition media.

"The stations closed have been involved in incitement of violence. That's not something I think the country can afford."

A number of commissions have been set up to look at national, constitutional and media reform, as well as a truth inquiry to establish exactly what happened during the protests. He says reconciliation is a priority.

But the red-shirt security guard sent a stark warning.

"What happens depends on what the government does against us. How much pressure they put on us and how patient we will be.

"I don't want anything to happen to our country, but when that day comes it might not be as we hope - the violence will be double what we have seen in the past."

The original article can be found here on BBC's website.