March 27, 2014 (Tony Cartalucci - NEO) - R2P,
or the “responsibility to protect,” was a geopolitical tool used by the
West after thoroughly destabilizing a nation through armed proxies to
then intervene militarily, enact regime change, occupy, and reorder the
nation both economically and sociopolitically. It has been used to
devastating effect in Serbia in the carving out of Kosovo, as well as more recently in Libya.
In Kosovo, the Canadian National Post would report in their article, “U.S. supported al-Qaeda cells during Balkan Wars,” that:
In the years immediately before the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999, the al-Qaeda militants moved into Kosovo, the southern province of Serbia, to help ethnic Albanian extremists of the KLA mount their terrorist campaign against Serb targets in the region.
The mujahedeen “were financed by Saudi and United Arab Emirates money,” said one Western military official, asking anonymity. “They were mercenaries who were not running the show in Kosovo, but were used by the KLA to do their dirty work.”
The United States, which had originally trained the Afghan Arabs during the war in Afghanistan, supported them in Bosnia and then in Kosovo. When NATO forces launched their military campaign against Yugoslavia three years ago to unseat Mr. Milosevic, they entered the Kosovo conflict on the side of the KLA, which had already received “substantial” military and financial support from bin Laden’s network, analysts say.
This
reveals that the war itself was initially precipitated by NATO and
thereafter expanded through the intentional training, funding, and
arming of terrorists imported into the region with the specific goal of
creating enough bloodshed to justify NATO intervention and the
subsequent geopolitical reordering of Serbia.
In
Libya, in 2011, not only was the West openly funding and arming the Al
Qaeda franchise, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), but the
so-called atrocities cited by the West to invoke the “responsibility to
protect” were admittedly fabricated by Western-backed Libyan “human
rights” advocates making the claims.
Dr. Sliman Bouchuiguir of the US-French affiliated Libyan League for Human Rights openly
admitted to documentary makers that the “atrocities” used by NATO to
militarily intervene in Libya were fabrications and that the West, not
his organization, orchestrated the assembling of over 70 NGOs – which he
notes were already well “acquainted.”
In a video documentary titled, “Lies behind the “Humanitarian War” in Libya: There is no evidence!,” Bouchuiguir openly
admits that there was no way to generate actual numbers regarding the
atrocities he cited, and that all of his numbers are what he called
“estimations” which originated not from documented fieldwork, but from
the opposition’s leadership – in other words, compromised, baseless
claims made by biased sources, laundered through “trusted” Western NGOs
to appear out the other end as fact.
It
was on these baseless opposition claims that NATO would militarily
intervene in Libya, where documented atrocities would then actually take
place, including the surrounding, intentional starvation, and NATO aerial bombardment of the cities of Sirte and Bani Walid as well as the racially-motivated, genocidal purging of cities like Tawarga.
The Real Threat in Ukraine
Unlike
in Serbia and Libya, where the West depended on fabricated narratives
and contrived atrocities to vilify governments it sought to overthrow –
with lengthy and absurd narratives describing the alleged ideologies
that drove each government to commit atrocities that in fact never took
place, in Kiev, the US-backed regime that has seized power, openly and
enthusiastically embraces the ideology of Adolf Hitler’s Nazism.
