Bilderberg 2011

Editor's Note: The Bilderberg meetings appear to be a presentation of upcoming gambits, however, undoubtedly a consensus is formed. Last year's topics included "Social Networking: From the Obama Campaign to the Iranian Revolution" which of course is a direct reference to the upcoming, entirely contrived "Arab Spring." While the think-tanks and funding arms were already hard at work for at least 3 years preparing for it, it was a topic of discussion at the Bilderberg meeting just as it was about to go operational.

Background, Preview and Predictions
James Corbett
The Corbett Report
5 June, 2011

The Middle East & then the World

Globalist blitzkrieg signals largest geopolitical reordering since WW2.
analysis by Tony Cartalucci

Beginning in North Africa, now unfolding in the Middle East and Iran, and soon to spread to Eastern Europe and Asia, the globalist fueled color revolutions are attempting to profoundly transform entire regions of the planet in one sweeping move. It is an ambitious gambit, perhaps even one born of desperation, with the globalists' depravity and betrayal on full display to the world with no opportunity to turn back now.

To understand the globalists' reasoning behind such a bold move, it helps to understand their ultimate end game and the obstacles standing between them and their achieving it.

The End Game

The end game of course is a world spanning system of global governance. This is a system controlled by Anglo-American financiers and their network of global institutions ensuring the world's consolidated nations conform to a singular system they can then perpetually fleece. As megalomaniacal oligarchs, their singular obsession is the consolidation and preservation of their power. This will be achieved through a system of population control, industrial control, and monetary control, which together form the foundation of their Malthusian policies.

These policies are on full display in the UN's "Agenda 21," and by policy wonks like the current White House Science Adviser John Holdren in his book titled "Ecoscience."

Malthusian as their policies may be, they surely do not believe the world is in danger due to over-population or the environmental hazards posed by industrial progress. Instead, like all tyrants in history, they are establishing a convincing narrative to defend the immense concentration of undue power within their elitist hands and the implementation of measures to ensure such power stays in their hands indefinitely.

The immediate dangers posed to their plans are numerous, including an alternative media increasingly exposing the true nature of their agenda, and thus awakening a vast number of people who simply refuse to go along with it. There is also national sovereignty, where nations are openly challenging this Anglo-American centric world order and refusing to implement the conditions of their own enslavement.

These sweeping color revolutions, and coordinated military operations, both overt and covert, are dealing with the latter of these two challenges, while censorship, cognitive infiltration, and a tightening police state spanning the Western world under the very false premise of a "War on Terror" confronts the former.

Red = US-backed destabilization, Blue = US occupying/stationed.
China's oil and seaways are all covered.

The Middle East

With the globalist fueled destabilization in progress, concessions and regime changes are being made from Jordan to Egypt, all in the name of "democratization." The protesters' calls are verbatim repeats of the their local US funded NGOs' mission statements. Skeptical as many may be that all of this is being orchestrated by the West, one needs only read the RAND Corporation's 2007 report titled "Building Moderate Muslim Networks" where breathtaking confessions are made to not only reorder the Muslim world according to the West's interests, but how they would follow the same model of "civil society networks" they have already used for decades during the Cold War.

Egypt's recent "transition" played out as a direct translation of RAND's blueprint for meddling in the Muslim world. From the protest organizers and NGOs to the protest leaders, to the behind-the-scenes meddling by America's military leadership, the Egyptian uprising was entirely a US production. Even the drafting of the new Egyptian Constitution is being carried out by organizations funded by George Soros and the US National Endowment for Democracy.

The regional destabilization is resetting the geopolitical board in favor for a renewed effort to affect regime change in Iran. It has been extensively covered that the globalists have intricate and extensive plans, in the form of Brookings Institute's "Which Path to Persia?" report, to fund color revolutions, support terrorism inside of the Islamic Republic and even provoke war with a nation they concede would rather avoid conflict. No sooner did North African and Arab regimes begin to crumble did the "Green Revolution" in Iran start up again. As if reiterating the summation of Brookings' report, the globalist Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has recently and overtly called on the US to back the "Green Revolution."

Iran's fall to the globalists, the extraction of its wealth, and the end of its support for Chinese and Russian economic and military ambitions would isolate the so-called Shanghai Cooperative Organization further.

NATO creeping forward, suffering failures in Ukraine, Belarus, and Georgia.

Russia's Encirclement

Russia, along with China appear to be the two biggest blocs of opposition to the Anglo-American establishment. Indeed there are plenty of people and organizations within each nation gladly working hand-in-hand with the globalists, who in turn, are overtly trying to tempt and coerce the two nations to integrate themselves into their global world order.

Men like Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who rose to power in Russia amongst an era of immense corruption, began building networks of NGOs modeled directly after those of the Anglo-Americans in the West, even naming this network the "Open Russian Foundation" after George Soros' Open Society Foundation. According to geopolitical researcher William Engdahl, this Open Russian Foundation included Henry Kissinger and Lord Jacob Rothschild on its board of directors and its goal was to transform Russia from a sovereign state and into something more palatable for globalist consumption.

Whatever Khdorkovsky's early successes may have been, they were cut short by Russian Prime Minister Vladamir Putin, who has safely confined Khodorkovsky behind the bars of a Siberian prison. Today, Khdorkovsky receives lobbying and legal services from notorious globalist lawyer Robert Amsterdam who leads international efforts to vilify Russia and justify the nation's encirclement by NATO.

After Tunisia fell and protests began brewing in Egypt, Foreign Policy magazine published the Freedom House's list of "Who's Next?" On the list was Belarus' Aleksandr Lukashenko, leader of a European nation directly bordering Russia's western border, staring Moscow in the face. NATO itself admits the reluctance of Belarus to join its now unjustified organization, while the mainstream media berates the Belarusian government for putting down protests launched after the results of recent elections that saw the Western-backed opposition defeated.

Looking at a map of Russia, not a nation touching its borders has been spared the globalist treatment, from the Ukraine and their US-backed Orange Revolution, to Georgia and its US-backed invasion of South Ossetia. For Russia, they seem more than prepared to fight back, humiliating the US-trained and equipped Georgian military on the battlefield and overseeing the results of the US-funded Orange Revolution overturned, with Ukrainian talks to join NATO halted.

By targeting the Middle East, and in particular Iran, which both China and Russia have been using to check the West's world domineering ambitions, the globalists' hope is to renew political unrest in Russia's satellite regions and complete its campaign of encircling Russia, thus forcing it to concede to its place amongst the new global order.

SSI's "String of Pearls:" China's oil lifeline.

China's String of Pearls

It is no secret China depends on oil imports to not only keep its economy growing, but to keep its vast population busy and prosperous, thus keeping the ruling government in power. This has been a long known realism by both China and the West. For China's part, they have begun building a presence on continental Africa, especially in Sudan where they have established a 1,000 mile oil pipeline from the vast nation's heartland to Port Sudan on the Red Sea. They have also provided relief to the country from UN sanctions and buys the majority of Sudan's oil exports.

China also imports an immense amount of oil from Iran. In fact, the Islamic Republic represents the world's second largest exporter of oil to China, behind Saudi Arabia.

From Sudan and Iran, across the Indian Ocean, and back to China's shores in the South China Sea, represents a "String of Pearls," or a series of geopolitical assets China is developing to protect this vital logistical route. This "String" includes a Chinese port in Pakistan's Baluchistan region, another facility in Myanmar (Burma), and expanded facilities in the South China Sea off the coast of Vietnam. China is also building up the size and capabilities of its fleet, including submarines which now shadow America's carrier groups, and the outfitting of their first aircraft carrier which is nearing completion.

The term "String of Pearls" was used as the title of the US Strategic Studies Institute's (SSI) 2006 report "String of Pearls: Meeting the challenge of China’s rising power across the Asian littoral." In this report, China's ambitions to project its power along this route is viewed as a direct challenge to American supremacy as well as a threat to the West's unipolar vision of a "new world order."

While China may not be a champion of human freedom, they do appear to favor a multipolar world where sovereign nations coexist instead of the Anglo-American unipolar world where, unsurprisingly, the British and American oligarchs dominate the planet.

To prevent such a multipolar world from coming into existence, the SSI report suggests several strategies regarding China, from engaging and enticing it to become what globalist pusher Robert Zoellick calls a "responsible stakeholder" in the "international system," to outright military confrontation and containment.

Of course this report was written in July 2006, and the ink hadn't even dried before Israel suffered a humiliating defeat in its war with Lebanon, the war with Iran stalled, and globalist minion Thaksin Shinawtra was ousted from power in Thailand in a display of jealously defended sovereignty in Southeast Asia.

It appears that the globalists, over the following years, would present China with a flattering role to play in their global order while simultaneously destabilizing nearly every nation along the "String of Pearls." The US has expanded its war in Afghanistan and is attempting to balkanize Pakistan in the process, specifically the Baluchistan region where China is establishing a naval presence. Pakistan's Baluchistan region is also the seaside starting point of an energy and logistical conduit running northward through the Himalayas and into Chinese territory. The US is also heavily involved in destabilizing Myanmar (Burma) to affect regime change and subsequently establishing a Washington dependent government.

Thailand neighbors Myanmar to the east and possesses the narrow Kra Isthmus China would like to develop into a Suez/Panama Canal-like project to shorten trips for its oil laden, China-bound tankers. Thailand also serves as an overland conduit, running north and south as in Pakistan, with a developed rail system connecting Singapore's shipping yards to Laos' capital of Vientiane. China has begun the development of a rail system through Laos and the upgrading of Thailand's rail system. Thailand also is one of the world's largest rice exporters, which makes the nation vital to China's future growth.

It is no surprise then, that Thailand, like Myanmar, has suffered multiple attempts by the US to affect regime change. Their man, Thaksin Shinawatra is an overt globalist, having formally served as an adviser to the Carlyle Group, and since his ousting from power in 2006, has been lobbied for by everyone from James Baker's Baker Botts, to ICG's Kenneth Adelman and the Edelman PR firm, to his current lobbyist and lawyer, Robert Amsterdam.

It is quite clear that Washington is using its control of the Middle East and its control of the seas, albeit challenged control, to check China's vastly superior financial and economic position. It is also clear that Washington is investing a great amount of military resources and intelligence assets to destabilize the entire "String of Pearls" to confound, contain, and leverage concessions from China, with the ultimate goal of folding the emerging Asian giant into the unipolar Anglo-American global order.

How well this strategy is working is debatable, however, the US military is politically hobbled, strategically stretched, and led by vastly incompetent leaders in Washington who have lost the faith and trust of their own population, not to mention the world. The bold and perhaps desperate gambit the US is playing out in the Middle East could be a bid to rectify years of failure against China and the Shanghai Cooperative since the SSI wrote their report in 2006. Regime change in Iran is still the linchpin in making this latest bid a success.

South America

Even South America is not spared. There has been a lull in overt American meddling, allowing South America to become a bastion of sorts against the agents of globalization, however, covert operations and staging has been ongoing.

Troubling reports coming from South America's Argentina, no stranger to the ire of Anglo-American ambitions, indicate that tension is building up between Buenos Aires and Washington. It has culminated in a diplomatic row over a recently seized US C-17 transport chalk full of suspicious equipment and an even more suspicious explanation. This is leading many, including the government of Argentina, to believe the US is staging another round of destabilization efforts in South America.

Venezuela and Bolivia have been overtly targeted by the West in recent years by efforts to undermine and even overthrow their respective governments. The muted-confused response over the coup in Honduras also raises suspicions that America has begun striking back against the wave of regional nationalism sweeping South America. A visit over to Movements.org reveals that the US State Department/corporate funded organization is backing dissidents in Venezuela and encouraging the spread of "civil society," gleefully noting the insidious effects it is having on bolstering the anti-Chavez opposition.

Conclusion

The recent US-backed wave of revolution sweeping the Middle East is just the beginning of a greater move to dislodge Iran and begin regaining ground against Russia and China after several years of disappointing results geopolitically. The ultimate goal in mind is to force Russia and China to accept their role as "responsible stakeholders" in the unipolar Anglo-American "new world order." The unipolar world of Anglo-American financier domination requires that all competition be eliminated, all nations become interdependent, and most importantly, all governments conform to the globalists' model of "civil society" which in turn answers to centralized global institutions.

Understanding the overarching plan reveals the danger of being apathetic or complacent about the current unrest in the Middle East. It will surely spread, and depending on the Shanghai Cooperative's response and their determination to remain the masters of their own destiny, greater confrontation may ensue. For the United States and its dwindling power, its meaningless offers to the world's nations to join their bankrupt, one-sided model of world governance, and their growing economic mire, there is no telling what their desperation may transform into. This unpredictability and desperation may be perhaps the only card they have left in their hand worth playing, and one that should trouble us all.

Globalist Hit Unfolding in Egypt

Balk the Globalists in Egypt, Balk them everywhere.

By Tony Cartalucci

Amidst imagery of chaos unfolding across Egypt the mainstream media and the interests controlling them have declared decidedly that "Hosni Mubarak" must go. From AlJazeera's over-the-top propaganda, to geopolitical chess-master Zbigniew Brzezinski himself calling for Mubarak to step down, it is clear public opinion is being pushed in the direction of bolstering the protests against the long entrenched Egyptian autocrat.

The praise and adulation of the protesters is only outmatched by the mainstream news' endearment of Mohamed ElBaradei, the International Crisis Group trustee leading the protests on behalf of US policy makers he officially works for. It is already being claimed by the media that ElBaradei has unified the opposition under his "National Front for Change," that includes the Muslim Brotherhood. ElBaradei 's premeditated agitation of the Egyptian people began in tandem with Wall Street and the World Bank's coordinated efforts to raise food prices and cripple the Egyptian economy (as well as other target nations in the region) as early as last year. ElBaradei himself had begun setting up his "National Front for Change" in February, 2010.

Revisiting the headlines in February 2010, reveals that the mainstream media was already slating ElBaradei as a potential replacement for Mubarak, as next president of Egypt.

The role the globalist think tanks have played in this unfolding engineered color revolution is strikingly overt. In March of 2010, the Council on Foreign Relations had articles already developing a strategy to usher in a "new Egypt" under the leadership of their man, ElBaradei. In Steve Cook's piece "Is ElBaradei Egypt's Hero?" he explicitly states:

"Further, Egypt’s close relationship with the United States has become a critical and negative factor in Egyptian politics. The opposition has used these ties to delegitimize the regime, while the government has engaged in its own displays of anti-Americanism to insulate itself from such charges. If ElBaradei actually has a reasonable chance of fostering political reform in Egypt, then U.S. policymakers would best serve his cause by not acting strongly."

It then comes as no surprise that President Obama, and Vice President Biden, have come out instead to support the embattled Hosni Mubarak to further agitate anti-American sentiment towards him. To compound the betrayed dictator's ordeal, Israel has delivered the coup de grâce, by "insisting" the world curb its criticism of Mubarak in an oafish effort to defend his regime. AlJazeera's claim that the Egyptian embassy in Tel Aviv is making preparations for Mubarak to flee to Israel is an almost over-the-top interpretation of the CFR's advice.

The strategy of course is to appeal to emotions; emotions of hatred toward tyranny, monarchy, elitism, toward the governments of America and Israel that have misled their people to their own detriment and the nations they have meddled in for decades - hatred so strong that they blind the people to the complexities of this engineered crisis.

The classic gambits of class-warfare, religion, and race seem to be tools well-oiled and working as smoothly as ever in the hands of the globalists as they dismantle their old ally in Egypt and prepare to replace him with their new man, Mohamed ElBaradei. If it is true that the Muslim Brotherhood is also a western intelligence front, it is no surprise then that they have come to support ElBaradei's "National Front for Change" or that they are fomenting similar unrest in Jordan, Yemen, Saudi Arabia and beyond, all with the Brookings Institute, CFR and other globalists' gleeful encouragement.

In frustrating the globalist conspiracy it is essential that emotions are put aside and instead objectivity used to dissect, expose, and balk their agenda. If ElBaradei's ties to top US policy makers were headline news before the Internet in Egypt was cut, perhaps the Egyptian people would be closer to real revolution instead of installing yet another globalist puppet.

This time, their puppet, ElBaradei, is fully removed from the nation he insincerely now claims such concern over. He is not a man of of the army nor a man of the people. His ties to the US are so abundantly overt and the conditions around his attempted rise to power so insidious he will be forever indebted to serve his masters' every command. For ElBaradei, there will be no dragging of feet or compromise when the globalists call, lest they expose him as overtly as they now do Mubarak. Having a puppet like Mubarak is nice, having one so servile and compromised like ElBaradei, nicer still.

It is essential that the globalists be stopped in their engineering of Egyptian politics, not only to head-off their other planned color-revolutions, but to set back the plans that hinge on these revolutions indefinitely. As counter intuitive as it may seem, Dr. Webster Tarpley's hope for status-quo in Egypt may be the best way to confound the globalist agenda.

CFR's Foreign Affairs on "Egypt's Hero"

By Tony Cartalucci

In the Council on Foreign Affairs' (CFR) publication "Foreign Affairs," writer Steven Cook describes ElBaradei as "A lawyer and diplomat by training," and that he "has always played the role of the ultimate international bureaucrat -- a somewhat dour technocrat whose ties to his native country seemed purposely tenuous, to allow him to more freely contribute to improving global governance," in his piece tilted "Is El Baradei Eypt's Hero?" He goes on to write about ElBaradei's "National Front for Change" and how the Muslim Brotherhood has signaled support for it.

Cook also maintains the myth that ElBaradei cannot be accused of being "a stooge of the United States" side stepping his prominent position in the International Crisis Group and instead citing his clashes with the US during his time at the IAEA. It should be noted that these "clashes" did nothing to change America's insistence on invading Iraq or its continued belligerence toward Iran.

Finally Cook finishes his piece suggesting that "not acting strongly" in support of ElBaradei would best serve America's interests as Egyptian support for American foreign policy has long been a negative factor politically.

Indeed, if Americas' President Obama instead supported the besieged Muburak regime it may only fuel the protests. With any luck, and in the midst of emotional and violent chaos in the streets, ElBaradei may slip in without Egyptians ever considering why the real power behind America, the media and the think-tanks they work for, is so adamantly supporting him.

Judy Clarke to Defend Arizona Suspect

Judy Clarke has been sought out to defend Jared Loughner

by Tony Cartalucci

The facts surrounding the Arizona shooting that claimed 6 lives including Judge John Roll, and injured several more including US Representative Gabrielle Giffords, are still forthcoming. This isn't stopping the two-headed globalist media machine from leveraging the event to suspend free speech, further disarm the public and justify the ever increasing police state being built up by various contrived federal agencies like the Department of Homeland Security.

As pundits fall into the all too familiar trap of demagogic infighting over who may have motivated the suspected and incredibly deranged Jared Loughner, suspicious circumstances are creeping by unnoticed.

It was announced with little notice by the alternative media that none other than attorney Judy Clarke would be defending Loughner. Judy Clarke has made a career handling suspects at the center of high-profile globalist gambits, including the Unabomber Ted Kaczynski, Olympic bomber Eric Rudolph, Oklahoma City Bomber Timothy McVeigh, and 9/11's Zacarias Moussaoui.

To say Judy Clarke has an impressive collection of mentally deranged patsies would be an understatement. One must wonder whether Judy Clarke's skill set is really that impressive and unique in defending a particular brand of lunatic, coincidentally involved in "anti-government" violence or whether her involvement and reliability indicates a certain level of control and quarantine needed for a cover-up.

Only time will tell as details and information trickle out, and only if the alternative media raises its head from about the demagogic infighting long enough to see and report them.

Tragedy in Arizona

The Tragedy of America

by Tony Cartalucci

The shooting in Arizona on January 8, 2011, which left 6 dead and 13 injured including Representative Gabrielle Giffords, is most certainly a tragedy for the victims, their family and friends as well as those who witnessed the murder spree unfold. This goes without saying. Equally as tragic, though more difficult to admit, are the lost minds that commit such dark deeds.

The tragedy of Jared Loughner and those gunned down in Arizona extends beyond his suspected crime and his apparent motivations, as the corporate media machine spins into action to convict not only him in the court of public opinion, but through wild speculation, those perceived to have served as the genesis of his actions.

The most brazen example this comes in the form of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) which claims it "is dedicated to fighting hate and bigotry, and to seeking justice for the most vulnerable members of our society." SPLC Director Mark Potok has no problem speculating about a crime pending full investigation and a trial, contra to his own organization's mission to seek "justice," and takes this circumvention of due process further by implicating a laundry list of political ideologies as feedstock for his yet to be convicted crimes.



Potok takes particular interest in implicating proponents of sound currency backed by gold or silver (Article One: Section 10 of the US Constitution), tax protesters (what served as the impetus of America's creation in the first place), and the writings of Ayn Rand - in particular her emphasis on individual rights. Potok continues on to claim that those repeating "falsehoods" in public regarding secret plots by Mexico to "retake the southern US" or the "death panels" contained within the recent US health care bill, are not exonerated when people react violently even if they are mentally unstable.

Potok's contempt for personal responsibility and freedom of speech is compounded when one looks into the issues he claims are falsehoods, only to find they are real issues being spoken about, not by opponents, but by proponents of the said "falsehoods."

Here is La Raza "not" talking about taking back the southern US.



Here is Bill Gates, a health care reform supporter "not" talking about death panels.

What can be said about a society that serves as host to organizations like the SPLC who masquerade as pursuers of justice, when in reality they serve to crush legitimate dissent? What can be said about a society whose media serves as a platform to constantly undermine the freedoms innate to us all as human beings while simultaneously attempting to derail due process and the proper course of justice?

This "leveraging of agenda" by the SPLC has been repeated on Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, as well as various printed and online publications throughout contemporary American society and truly adds a shade of gray to the tragedy in Arizona on January 8, 2011.

The Decline of the American, "The Walking Dead"

One may wonder what has gone wrong with America. What is causing tragedies like the one in Arizona and why does it serve as an impetus for dismantling the Bill of Rights?

The fact of the matter is that America has changed much since the Bill of Rights was written. Since then, America has wandered far from its Constitution and the mandate its leaders receive from it. Banks have most certainly taken over the Constitutional duty of Congress to issue America's currency, and are backing money not with gold or silver, but pyramiding fraud called "fractional reserve banking." Corporations have taken to the driver's seat of America's destiny, supplanting the American people who are now coaxed along via carefully implemented propaganda.

America has become the most heavily medicated nation on earth, the most imprisoned nation on earth, all while its education system struggles to keep up with other industrialized nations. Violence, sex, and amoral behavior of every kind is celebrated on TV, in music, movies, and video games, behind which the average American spends 4 or more hours a day consuming. Such an environment divorces many individuals from the personal responsibility required to enjoy their freedom as independent men and women, and diminishes their maturity as a nation.

Then there is the political demagoguery, that most certainly is charged as Mr. Potok suggests, with the exception that this inflaming demagoguery stems not from legitimate dissent, but from the very corporations medicating, imprisoning, and subjecting America to hours of crass media per day.

It is not angry Mexicans that have created or funded La Raza and the very real attempt to "seize" the southern US. It is the Ford Foundation and a myriad of globalist corporations, many of which share memberships on the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR makes no secret about their plans to "build a North American Community" and painstakingly described their plan in their 2005 report actually titled "Building a North American Community." The amount of wealth and power these corporations backing such organizations stand to gain by operating with full impunity in such a large, resource rich region are almost incalculable and serve as a convincing motive.

The obvious obstacle standing in the way of such an "integration" and future integrations with the already combined European Union, African Union, and the emerging Asian Economic Community is the concept of national sovereignty. The elimination of national sovereignty would entail the elimination of all such a concept entails, including a national Constitution, a national identity, a self-sufficient economy, and a healthy, educated and free population to serve as stewards of the nation, as intended by the US Constitution.

The border-less corporations and banks that direct America's current destiny have their bases covered. They purposefully provoke the unstable society they have cultivated, and leverage the resulting chaos to move forward their agenda. Such provocations may include government staged operations like 9/11, promoting infighting with staged wedge issues like the CFR funded "Ground Zero Mosque," or random violence emanating from an unemployed, dying country.

Whether Jared Loughner was a man on a mission, a man given a mission, or a man just completely lost, he constitutes a rising army of what radio host Alex Jones of Infowars.com coined as America's "walking dead." Morally bankrupt, broken minds produced by a society broken by design who will be used by the establishment to continue whittling away our rights. Relatively less acute examples such as the yearly "Walmart stampedes," surely do resemble a horde of walking dead.

"The madness of a lost society" aptly encapsulates America's morally bankrupt
"walking dead."

Conclusion

The problem with a plan to whittle away our rights is that our rights are inalienable, innate, and in existence long before the Founding Fathers put quill to parchment. They are irrevocable and non-negotiable. No crime can be committed, no enemy brought to our shores, no crisis suffered, and certainly no economic "opportunity" dangled above us that serves as an excuse to roll back anything enumerated in the Bill of Rights.

The key to preserving our rights is to use them responsibility. This brings us back to the beginning and the underlining premise the corporate controlled media is already laying out, that Jared Loughner took matters into his own hands after being incited by fiery rhetoric. Should this be proven true during Loughner's trial people must remember that no matter how much you disagree with the system, no matter how far it has wandered from its mandate, you have no ability to exercise violence against it without descending to the depths of evil you are opposed to.

We must also remember that we are bound by duty to exercise our rights responsibly and should we fail, we are bound by personal responsibility to suffer the consequences. "Collective punishment" in a nation of the people, by the people, for the people, is an oxymoron. Collective punishment exists only in the darkest depths of dictatorship and tyranny.

However, when confronted with run away tyranny we need to take heart in the example our Founding Father's set when declaring independence and writing the US Constitution. Boycott the system, replace the system, and if the tyrants decide to descend upon you after throwing off their oppressive system, then and only then do you take up arms to defend yourself.

The tragedy in Arizona and its unfolding consequences are a tragedy for America. Our ability to address and rectify this tragedy will be key to restoring our once great republic.

Welcome to the Prison Planet

The Debate is Over

by Tony Cartalucci

This is a real video found on "the Forum for the Future" website. There are three other "possibilities" also featured, all promoting "low carbon" lifestyles.

Some of the largest corporations on earth have signed on as partners of the "Forum for the Future." What might first appear as just another special interest lobbyist group, pushing a corporate agenda masquerading as a humanitarian cause, is actually the coup de grace, the globalist "end game" laid out for all to see.

The seemingly innocuous cartoon with its disarming music, features the future of the human race, confined in cities built by central planning, food rationing, the end of intercity travel, allocated slots on public transportation, allocated jobs, allocated housing, and just about every other aspect of corporate fascism, communism, socialism, Orwellian police state society, the Brave New World, and every other tyranny real or imagined cobbled together into one nightmarish and very real goal.

While three other possibilities are also featured, none remotely as terrifying as the one above, they seem less likely considering their divergence from the very real UN Agenda 21, a program of literally moving people off their land, and having them converge inside tightly controlled cities.

The Prototype and Piecemeal Progress

Further proof that "Planned-opolis" is the design of choice is the fact that it isn't something you have to wait for, the prototype already exists at the tip of the Malaysia Peninsula upon the island republic of Singapore. Described as "The Singapore Solution" by National Geographic, Singapore has achieved in one generation its booming metropolis with soaring towers, an efficient mass transportation system, safe streets, and relatively low unemployment through a system of draconian central planning under a single party system.

National Geographic proposes the following question: "What price prosperity and security? Are they worth living in a place that many contend is a socially engineered, nose-to-the-grindstone, workaholic rat race, where the self-perpetuating ruling party enforces draconian laws (your airport entry card informs you, in red letters, that the penalty for drug trafficking is "DEATH"), squashes press freedom, and offers a debatable level of financial transparency?"

National Geographic, and very obviously the Forum for the Future seems to argue, yes, social engineering and the suspension of your inalienable human rights are more than acceptable to ensure their idea of a well-oiled society is realized.

Take another look at the "partners" section of the Forum for the Future. What sort of planned city do you think would benefit the interests of Royal Dutch Shell, Cargill, or Bank of America? The goals of the Club of Rome and the UN's Agenda 21 have long been denied by the mainstream media, including Reuters and Time Warner's CNN, but something is changing.

The program for global government, the systematic dismantling of traditional human society, and the creation of a socially engineered, electronically controlled humanity is being openly sold to the public. It has been piecemeal laid into place on the back of wars, staged terrorism, the fraud that is "global warming," financial collapse, and the coming wars and cold wars waged against rising states.

One can only imagine the implements of tyranny that will be developed during an ensuing stand-off between the West and China or war with Iran. One can only imagine how alluring any job or home will be, allocated or not, following the collapse of America's dollar or the bursting of China's housing bubble, or any number of collapses the ponzi-globalist system seems prone to create.

Conclusion

Humanity's inalienable human rights are non-negotiable. For America, these rights are enshrined in the Bill of Rights, but were existent long before the Founding Fathers put quill to parchment and are applicable not just to Americans, but to all of humanity. No crisis, no threat, no philosophical argument can undermine, usurp or side-step these human rights. Furthermore, central planning, rationing, socialism are not solutions to any given problem, but rather stop-gaps at best. It is technology, education, innovation, and exploration that solve problems permanently.

Prehistoric man didn't emerge from the ice age because of careful rationing, socialist policies, or central planning, they did so by inventing better spears and hunting techniques. They further weathered food shortages and overpopulation by developing agricultural technology and exploring new climbs and places to settle. That is how we will successfully weather the challenges we face today, through innovation, technological progress, education, and the exploration of new climbs and place, including space travel and colonization.

Those that would deny you this future and confine you in a "planned city" within which they control your very destiny, seek to deny you your humanity. They do so not for the benefit of mankind or the planet, but to feed their insatiable megalomania. One only needs to consider Forum for the Future sponsor, Bank of America's "foreclosure frenzy" in which they were literally stealing homes from people who had fully paid for them, or fellow sponsor Royal Dutch Shell, one of the greatest purveyors of real environmental and humanitarian devastation in, amongst other places, Nigeria. These are businessmen, bankers, propagandists and polluters, already plaguing the world with their complete disregard for the environment or humanity. Would confining humanity to corporate sponsored "planned-cities" be offering a solution to the world's problems, or eliminating the possibility of anyone ever solving them?

For more on the Forum for the Future and their proposed "prison cities," visit Infowars.com.

United Corporate-Police States of America

Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura investigates America's growing police state.



By Tony Cartalucci

When former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura asks Homeland Security spokesman, Lance Clem, who in the Federal Government oversees the network of government funded "fusion centers," his answer is "no one." It is more than likely that corporations like the war profiteering Halliburton, slave running DynCorp and other globalist multi-nationals "oversee" and run them, as turned out to be the case in Pennsylvania when a private US-Israeli firm was caught profiling activists. This is a tyranny of the corporations, by the corporations, for the corporations. A tyranny to meet millions of Americans as they wake up to realize their "elected" representatives are nothing more than corporate rubber stampers, regardless of party lines and rhetoric.

The Federal Government has already deemed Americans as security threats, detained them without charges, and held them indefinitely without due process in purpose-built concentration camps. They were Americans of Japanese descent*, held during World War 2. If you think that it can't happen again, or the events of Nazi Germany can't be repeated else where in the world, including the United States, think again. It's happening right now, the stage is set, and only one question remains ... will Americans capitulate?

People might ask - why, if the government is so tyrannical, are shows like Governor Ventura's "Conspiracy Theories" allowed to air? Remember though, ghettos, concentration camps, mass murder and genocide in Germany weren't made possible because the Nazi's conducted a stealth, shadowy conspiracy. These horrific affronts to humanity were made possible by the German people's acquiescence and trust in their government that their very public policies of penning up "undesirable" members of society, sterilizing them under an aggressive, Anglo-American inspired eugenics program, literally tagging them, forcing them into slave labor and exterminating them were essential to "homeland security."

The price of the German people's ignorance, in some cases fear and cowardice, to stand up to tyranny cost them their nation, their prosperity and millions of their lives, homes, and livelihood. The price of allowing tyranny to fester in America will make 9/11, the excuse used to create the Hitlarian Department of Homeland Security, look like a footnote in history.

*It should be pointed out the role that the census plays before mass round-ups and genocidal purges are carried out. Both the Japanese in America and the Jews in Germany were identified as state enemies through the use of the census. America's recent, and quite un-Constitutional "redesign" of the US census, in the current climate holds frightening parallels to the build-up of past atrocities.

Conflicts of Convenience

North Korea's Latest Attack on South Korea


By Tony Cartalucci

President Barrack Obama's opulent tour of Asia this month included talks with South Korea over free-trade agreements. Those talks ultimately failed, Thursday, November 11, 2010, sending the bewildered president back home reinforcing to the world the weak hand America is now playing. This failed free-trade agreement between the US and South Korea is a continuation of President Bush's failed efforts during the latter part of his administration to push through the deal.

Asian markets continued to gain ground as the veneer of confidence in the US dollar and Western finance in general peels and falls to the ground. The problem for the West is compounded by Asia and other exporters erecting barriers around their monetary system to prevent currency manipulation and speculation.

Respected geopolitical analyst, Dr. Webster Tarpley observed that Japan, South Korea, Thailand, and Brazil have begun to control capital and exchange rates to protect their respective markets. Thailand and South Korea in particular are considering Tobin taxes, essentially taxes to penalize the sort of short-term speculation that has created the current economic crisis in the first place.



Tobin taxes directly strip speculating investors the tools of globalist economic manipulation they have used with such great effect during the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, and more recently in crippling European economies ahead of austerity and fire sales to pay back debt incurred by such wild (or engineered) speculation.

Protectionism runs contra to globalism, Tobin taxes the garlic to the banker's vampires. With unified European markets looking weak relative to the more protectionist Asian countries, and Ireland's government requesting a "rescue" from the IMF and EU, the peeling veneer of faith in the globalists' system seemed to be falling and taking chunks of the wall with it too.

Then, almost as if on cue, North Korea, Tuesday, November 23, 2010, opened fire on the South Korean island of Yeonpyeong, killing one South Korean Marine, injuring seriously several others including civilians and destroying homes located on the island.

South Korean, Japanese, and Chinese markets lost ground on the news as investors peeled funds away to place them in "safer" locations such as the US Dollar, lending the temporary illusion of strength and viability to the globalists' system during the initial phases of imposing crippling austerity on Ireland and sprinting through several more legs of their agenda.

Staged events, tipping off hot spots, and massive distractions, along with direct and proxy attacks on nation-states not playing well with the globalist agenda are nothing new. Color revolutions have plagued protectionist Thailand, now also considering Tobin taxes, since globalist minion Thaksin Shinwatra was ousted from power in a military coup.

Globalist think-tanks such as George Soros' and Zbigniew Brzezinski's International Crisis Group, and the Chatham House have overtly supported Thaksin Shinwatra's efforts to overthrow the Thai government via a "people's power" revolution and the creation of a single party government under Thaksin Shinwatra, and in turn of course, his foreign sponsors.

Similar colored revolutions were stoked in Eastern Europe, and more recently in Iran.

North Korea, like a pre-US election Bin Laden tape, always seems to come through in a pinch for the globalist agenda. As reported in an Infowars.com article "North Korea: An Enemy Made in the U.S.A." by Kurt Nimmo, it was America itself who provided North Korea with its nuclear technology and ultimately responsible for the threat it has become today.

While Iraq was invaded and mercilessly plundered based on contrived evidence of possessing weapons of mass destruction, North Korea menaced the world openly by detonating actual nuclear weapons during tests, and launching missiles toward Japan, with all but superficial reprimands.

Indeed, North Korea acts more like a leashed attack dog, an agitator for hire in the Asian region, rather than a rouge nation. To maintain a Hegelian dialectic to keep US forces in South Korea, Japan, and ever creeping into Asia with globalization, and when the globalists need help with their agenda the most, North Korea seems to answer the call. With North Korea now menacing the South, perhaps continued talks between South Korea and the United States will be more "productive" than the publicly failed talks earlier this month.

Meet Geert Wilders

Globalist Theater's Brightest New Star
by Tony Cartalucci

Geert Wilders (left) and Robert Spencer (right) prepare for a
breathtaking propagandizing performance.

The depth of the globalist's war propaganda and the sinister hands steering it in America was previously reported on in "Globalist Stunts: Islamophobia." Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) members John Bolton and Daniel Pipes and underlings like David Horowitz, his pet propagandist Robert Spencer of "Jihad Watch," and fellow propagandist, Pam Geller of "Atlas Shrugs," were all seen orchestrating crass fear mongering featuring the manufactured threat of "radical Islam."

These same names were also prominent during the CFR funded, organized, supported and protested "Ground Zero Mosque." The latest globalist stunt involving the fraudulent "War on Terror" is no different.

This stunt comes in the form of a "hate speech" trial in which Dutch globalist and Member of Parliament Geert Wilders is charged with inciting hatred against Muslims. Mr. Wilders has called Islam a "retarded culture," insists that Islam is not a religion but a totalitarian ideological/political system, that the Qu'ran is a fascist book, and that there is "no such thing as moderate Islam."

What pundits fail to notice is that he also proposes banning the Qu'ran, the closing of private Muslim schools, outlawing minarets, and the banning of scarves traditionally worn by Muslim women. With open-ended comments on Islam deeming it in and of itself an enemy with which war must be waged against in the Netherlands not far from a previous and despicable genocide aimed at another group of "socially incompatibles," many might feel Wilders is outlining a concrete plan of action. Indeed, if Wilders should be accused of anything, it should be for conspiracy to take away the rights of others.

Mr. Wilders sums up his beliefs and his desire to deny Dutch Muslims their rights best in his own words during this Russia Today interview. Meet Geert Widlers...


Hate speech = protected. Ending the rights of your citizens = tyranny.

While the trial of Geert Wilders focuses on his "hate speech" little is mentioned of his very real threats to Dutch citizens and their rights under the guise of combating "terrorism." This is a scenario that is playing out worldwide under the globalists and their "War on Terror." But after all, justice isn't the goal of this trial. The goal is, as it was with the CFR funded "Ground Zero Mosque" or the staged 9/11 and 7/7 attacks to begin with, to generate a continuous "clash of civilizations" to chew up and feed the world into the globalists' maw.

To better understand this stunt it is helpful to know the genesis of Geert Wilders himself, and the affiliations he has with the PNAC, CFR, and even Bilderberger hands helping him along.

Geert Widlers began his career working for notorious Royal Dutch Shell-man and Bilderberger Frits Bolkestein. He assisted Bolkestein in writing speeches and viewed him as a mentor. He was part of the Liberal Party, before starting his own, the Partij voor de Vrijheid (Party for Freedom). Like the Liberal Party before it, the Party for Freedom seems to spend its entire time fear mongering over the "creeping Sharia" of "radical Islam." Their solution is to ban scarves, minarets, the construction of new mosques, and private Muslim schools.

If you were expecting more dimension from this globalist character you will be sadly disappointed. He has spent the entirety of his time producing and promoting his short film titled "Fitna," in which he presents the standard globalist narrative of the "War on Terror" through the use of cherry picked Qu'ran verses, in between his over 4o trips to Israel, and his non-stop repetitive mantra hosted by CFR and PNAC characters in the United States.

In 2009, Wilders came to the United States, screened his "Fitna" war propaganda film in front of Arizona Senator Jon Kyl, appeared on the Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly shows, and met privately with the Wall Street Journal's editorial board, who then promptly wrote a piece defending him. He attended a CPAC event that needs to be seen to believe, including David Horowitz and Robert Spencer who were credited for helping fund Widler's appearance, along with Pamela Geller, and Frank Gaffney (PNAC).
A month later, Wilders was speaking in front of David Horowitz' "Freedom Center."

Wilders would also turn up at a "Free Speech Summit" at Palm Beach, wearing a Jewish kippah, claiming to have lived in Israel for several years, that he loves Israel, and that "we all are Israel." Wilders traces all of the violence in the Middle East not to the 100 years of Anglo-American occupations, wars, propped up dictatorships, foreign owned oil fields, invasions, and daily bombings by Western built and funded weapon systems, but rather on a battle between Islam and jihad against "freedom."

Don't let the kippah fool you, nor the synagogue setting of the "Free Speech Summit." These are not Jews, not even Zionists. These are godless, lying, exploitative globalists camouflaging themselves not unlike the "Christians" George Bush or Dick Cheney did, or the CFR globalist "Imam" Faisal Abdul Rauf does with Islam. There would be no way to get Jews, Christians, even Muslims to take the bait if they stood there the atheistic nihilist megalomaniacs they truly are.

With Geert Wilders being held up as a hero of the anti-Islamofascist movement by carefully camouflaged globalists and the need to get more people involved on either sides, it was time for a few globalist stunts.

In September 2010, Wilders was once again on American soil, this time for the 9th anniversary of 9/11. The occasion wasn't to honor the dead or search for answers, it was to kick around the political football that was the CFR funded "Ground Zero Mosque." Wilders wasted no time lying to the crowd gathered before him about the danger its construction posed to New York. Others involved in the gathering were once again the Globalist "Islamophobia" specialist team consisting of CFR Newt Gingrich, CFR/PNAC John Bolton, Robert Spencer, and Pamela Geller.

A false cause like Geert Wilders' dedication to defaming and prosecuting a religion of over a billion, requires perpetual effort, mass media reminders for the public, stunts and provocations to stay alive, which is what brings us to where we are now. "Stop Islamization of America," Pamela Geller & Robert Spencer's umbrella propaganda/activist network, having built up Wilders into what it calls a "great hero" now sees Wilders being put on trial for "hate speech."

CFR and PNAC minion Daniel Pipes emphatically supports Wilders' provocations by declaring him "the most important European alive today"for being in place "to deal with the Islamic challenge facing the continent," and has even set up a fund to pay for his legal defense in the Netherlands.

CFR/PNAC member Daniel Pipes (left) shares a photo with Geert Wilders, the man
helping fan the flames of his PNAC's "New Pearl Harbor."

Like the CFR's "Ground Zero Mosque," Wilders' trial provides the perfect forum for the mainstream media to mince the real issues of a globalist combine dominating the world - in favor for the re-injection of the "clash of civilizations," to debate our none-debatable inalienable rights, and to try and stir up the Muslims to rattle the cages of Westerners ahead of a long stalled war with Iran.

Wilders and the tentacles above and below are also intentionally trying to provoke the Islamic people who have been under siege since the fall of the Ottoman Empire, and campaigned against globally for the last decade. Having failed to sell an unprovoked attack against Iran, and a fumbling Israeli effort to justify a unilateral strike, the globalists seem to be looking for a provoked justification. Like a schoolyard bully slapping his victim in the face over and over again to illicit a response, Wilders and the men he works for push harder and harder.

Geert Wilders is associated neck-deep with members of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Project for a New American Century, the very men who's only missing ingredient in their 2000 "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report was a "new Pearl Harbor" and the resulting endless war. Wilders is out there everyday, ceaselessly trying to keep their war going in tandem with the "Stop Islamization of America" and "Stop Islamization of Europe" organizations. He is enjoying the support of minions like PNAC Frank Gaffney and David Horowitz who are populating the media with stories and defenses of his exploits, while CFR/PNAC members like Daniel Pipes gather money to pay for his legal expenses.

Wilders has been built up - gestated by a Bilderberger, handed over to the CFR as surrogate caretakers, and carried along by the globalist mainstream media. There is no way the Dutch, run wall-to-wall by Bilderbergers, are doing anything but putting on a show. The ground work and back-story for Wilders has been established, along with a certain fan-base, now it is time to bring him mainstream, center stage. Now it is time for the public as a whole to "Meet Geert Wilders."

Cass Sunstein's Plan to Prove the Government Isn't Lying: Lie

By Tony Cartalucci

From Cass Sunstein's "Conspiracy Theories" examining why the world thinks 9/11 is an inside job, generally distrusts the United States government, and how he thinks deception, infiltration, and flat out lying is a possible solution:

"In one variant, government agents would openly proclaim, or at least make no
effort to conceal, their institutional affiliations. A recent newspaper story recounts that
Arabic-speaking Muslim officials from the State Department have participated in
dialogues at radical Islamist chat rooms and websites in order to ventilate arguments not
usually heard among the groups that cluster around those sites, with some success.

In another variant, government officials would participate anonymously or even with false
identities. Each approach has distinct costs and benefits; the second is riskier but
potentially brings higher returns. In the former case, where government officials
participate openly as such, hard-core members of the relevant networks, communities and
conspiracy-minded organizations may entirely discount what the officials say, right from
the beginning. The risk with tactics of anonymous participation, conversely, is that if the
tactic becomes known, any true member of the relevant groups who raises doubts may be
suspected of government connections. Despite these difficulties, the two forms of
cognitive infiltration offer different risk-reward mixes and are both potentially useful
instruments."

Also within Sunstein's report is the brazen suggestion that independent "experts" be used as proxies as to obfuscate the government's role in disseminating information.

"Government can partially circumvent these problems if it enlists nongovernmental
officials in the effort to rebut the theories. It might ensure that credible independent
experts offer the rebuttal, rather than government officials themselves. There is a
tradeoff between credibility and control, however. The price of credibility is that
government cannot be seen to control the independent experts. Although government can
supply these independent experts with information and perhaps prod them into action
from behind the scenes, too close a connection will prove self-defeating if it is exposed --
as witness the humiliating disclosures showing that apparently independent opinions on scientific and regulatory questions were in fact paid for by think-tanks with ties to the Bush administration. Even apart from this tradeoff, conspiracy theorists may still fold
independent third-party rebuttals into their theory by making conspiratorial claims of
connection between the third party and the government."

The very act of enlisting nongovernmental officials, supplying them with information, and to then "prod them into action from behind the scenes," entirely negates their independent, impartial nature. And somehow, after all of this, the final result is supposed to be a public that once again trusts the government.

This isn't the first time the globalists have tried to white wash their conduct with buckets full of muck. The United States Air Force also was revealed by Wired magazine to be conducting their own "counter-blogging" program. Its aims slightly more general in nature, the program encourages Airman to actively monitor, correct or concur with comments on various blogs.

Be aware that there are infiltrators monitoring, manipulating, and possibly trying to entrap you online in forums, in comment sections, and in chat rooms. Please remember also that Cass Sunstein talks about "real world" infiltrators. Be aware that infiltrators are also manipulating, monitoring, inciting, and entrapping people at demonstrations, gatherings, and townhall meetings.

Police infiltrators posing as protesters to incite violence.

Expose this tactic and remove it from the globalists' arsenal. If everyone knows what these infiltrators look like, their activities will ultimately become "self-defeating" as even Sunstein fully acknowledges in his sophomoric grappling with the monumental corner his globalist paymasters have painted themselves into.

Globalist Stunts: Global Climate Change

Part two in a series exposing globalist stunts foisted upon humanity at the cost of our lives, our livelihood, our past and our future. For Part 1, Globalist Stunts: Islamophobia, click here.

By Tony Cartalucci

The story of "global warming" starts 65 million years ago, during the Cretaceous period. According to National Geographic "Two New Dinosaurs Discovered in Antarctica," "Antarctica has sat at much the same latitude for the last hundred million years. But during the Cretaceous it enjoyed a warmer, lusher climate, similar to that of the U.S. Pacific Northwest today. (The Cretaceous period started 144 million years ago and ended 65 million years ago.)"

During this period, what is now North America featured a massive inland sea covering much of the Midwest.

Mesozoic Inland Sea of North America - 65 million B.C.

Global warming and rising sea levels occurred naturally, long before the first humans ever existed. An honest and thorough study of natural history reveals that wild, linear fluctuations are the only 'norms' that exist in terms of climatology. Consider the ever changing geological face of the earth. Pangaea, the mega-continent that existed 250 million years ago, surely affected global climate and drove its change as it shifted and separated into today's seven continents.

Geology - shifting continents, pushing islands up from beneath the sea while swallowing others, not only drove climatology, but biology as well. Flora and fauna populations shift, expand and contract as geology shapes the ever changing face of the earth. At no two points in natural history does the earth look the same, geologically, biologically, climatologically, nor will such a phenomenon ever be possible. It is a constant linear process, not a cycle. Cycles are superficial and temporary, existing for relatively minuscule periods of time.

Has this fact, evident to school children looking at pictures of prehistoric America complete with inland seas, long extinct animals and plant life, eluded our top scientific minds? Obviously not.

Global warming is in fact a scam perpetrated by globalists to control every aspect of human industry, population, consumption and demographics, as declared in the United Nation's Agenda 21 report and conclusions drawn at the globalist Club of Rome forum. After decades of uncontested propagandizing, the globalist agenda began to slow under the scrutiny of skeptics able to propose their objections en-mass via the Internet.

Under increasing pressure, exposing inconsistencies and bold faced lies, globalists themselves have literally conceded that their "irrefutable research" on all fronts is "flawed," (read: lies).

Times Online: "UN climate chief admits Mistake on Himalayan glaciers warning"

Times Online: "UN climate change expert: there could be more errors in report"

Mail Online: "Climategate U-turn as Scientist at Centre of Row Admits: There has been no global warming since 1995."

Telegraph: "UN admits flaw in report on meat and climate change"

Obviously the irrefutable scientific consensus Al Gore proposed is as contrived as the globalist "War on Terror" threat. And just like the fraudulent "War on Terror," "global climate change" has reaped globalist corporate combines a windfall of profits.

Remember the "Carbon Clock" put up in New York City's Times Square? It wasn't genuine conservationists behind this public stunt, but the shifty banksters over at Deutsche Bank. According to Deutsche Bank's own website, "Deutsche Bank has been a leading participant in the international carbon credit market since its inception."

Money is to be made on the back of this hoax, and so the globalist controlled media is going to keep the fear mongering going as long as possible/profitable. Carbon trading is merely the first in a long series of brazen domineering financial scams working in tandem with the "War on Terror" driven police state, and big-pharma driven "pandemic" vaccine scams. The next step is literally taxing CO2 emissions.

Since the contrived monetization of "carbon" like all financial markets, depends on a certain level of stability, and the science behind carbon emissions, by the UN's own admission is far from settled, society is being shoehorned into these markets where key players refuse to change the rules once agreed upon and fraudulent money starts flowing. Does this sound like a solution or a swindle?

The fact that the climate has forever been in a perpetual state of change and the fact that it is now public knowledge that the "science" behind "global climate change" is fraudulent, doesn't matter to the globalists. They will simply insist, as White House Science Adviser John Holdren does here, that any change of weather constitutes justification for their criminal intentions.



Criminal scams like carbon trading and carbon taxes don't just represent unprecedented corruption on a global scale. They threaten human progress altogether.

Cars do pollute our air. Poison is being dumped into our water. Genetically modified organisms are corrupting natural flora and fauna worldwide. Resources could be more efficiently used, manufacturing processes improved, and new forms of energy and transportation pursued. Manufacturing and agriculture could be decentralized/localized to allow people to be more directly involved in the mechanisms of society and not only improve efficiency, but speed up the progress at which efficiency is achieved. This requires improved education, innovation, and mountains of regulations protecting destructive corporate monopolies to be removed. Strangely, none of these solutions are part of the globalists' agenda.

By exacting a tax on human activity, the globalists tighten control over populations worldwide, narrowing their ability to sustain themselves and increase their dependence on their global institutions. It would then be up to us to trust these handful of global elitists, who have written ad nauseum about their desire to reduce our numbers and subjugate us with a global planetary regime. Judging by the behavior of prime suspects like Deutsche Bank, who already have looted and robbed within their own burgeoning carbon trading scam, its obvious such trust would be misplaced - and much to the detriment of humanity.

photo by Rachel Stringer

Globalist Stunts: Islamophobia

Elites use movies and "documentaries" past and present to stoke war and atrocities.

It started with speeches by President George Bush like this one he delivered at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland in 2005. In it, he states that terrorists "would then use Iraq as a base from which to launch attacks against America and overthrow moderate governments in the Middle East and try to establish a totalitarian Islamic empire that reaches from Indonesia to Spain."

Never mind using the consequences of the invasion as justification FOR the invasion; the "clash of civilizations" was born. The target audience was the average American and European, profoundly ignorant, religious zealots in their own right, and true believers that bearded men in turbans outwitted America's trillion dollar defense network on 9/11 and has continued to confound the world's most powerful military for now nearly a decade.

Able to overlook billions in war profits for the Council on Foreign Relations' various corporate members, like DynCorp and KBR and the fact that the war in Afghanistan is growing the world's largest narco-terrorist state, complete with US troops guarding opium fields and the CIA funding drug kingpins running the country, this demographic is made to believe Islam itself is the root of all problems.

George Bush, of course, doesn't ever officially declare this. He leaves this job to the real leadership, the globalist think tanks and their satellite organizations.

Council on Foreign Relations tentacle PNAC (Project for a New American Century), was already fleshing out the "War" part of the "War on Terror" long before 9/11 took place in their "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report in 2000. In it, the only missing ingredient for their full-spectrum domination of the planet was a catalyzing event, a "new Pearl Harbor."

Of course on 9/11 they got their "new Pearl Harbor." The next step, as any war propagandist ever to live since the beginning of humanity knows, was to dehumanize the supposed enemy. The enemy was decidedly "Islam."

"All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach." -Adolf Hitler

Not much has changed since Hitler and his henchmen duped an entire nation into a suicidal war that cost millions their lives and decades of painful recovery. Watching the 2006 war propaganda film "Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West" featuring British police informants, Council on Foreign Relations PNAC signatory "Islamophobia" ring leader Daniel Pipes, and Steven Emerson of "The Investigative Project on Terrorism," we are reminded by its cartoonish nature that ghoulish men still strictly adhere to Hitler's doctrine of duping the masses with rudimentary fear mongering . David Horowitz, of the "Freedom Center" toured America screening the propaganda film, while the "Clarion Fund" mass-mailed it to millions of Americans ahead of the 2008 presidential election.

A quick look at Daniel Pipes' or Steven Emerson's websites will show shameless and relentless reinforcement of the U.S. government's official narrative surrounding 9/11; that it was perpetrated by "radical Islam" and that "radical Islam" is the greatest threat the West now faces. Steven Emerson's "Investigative Project on Terrorism" recently sent one of their salesmen to Bill O'Reilly's show on CFR News Corporation's Fox News, trying to link "Truthers" with radical Islam.



Perhaps the most insulting aspect of this clip was the omitted fact that Faisal Abdul Rauf is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, like Rupert Murdoch and his News Corporation, while his activities are being openly funded by the Carnegie Corporation and various Rockefeller funding arms, all chaired by CFR members. In fact, O'Reilly features video of Rauf speaking in front of the CFR.

Other permanent fixtures of the globalist's "Islamophobia" stunt are Robert Spencer of "Jihad Watch," a David Horowitz Freedom Center project, and Pamela Geller of "Atlas Shrugs." A quick look at the sensational, cartoonish headlines, trying to blame everything from stubbed toes to dry mouth on Islam, we are reminded of Adolf Hitler's "comprehension of the least intelligent" tenant of propaganda.

Robert Spencer divides his time between commentating on Fox News, speaking in front of the globalist Heritage Foundation, and writing book, after book cherry picking versus from the Qu'ran to demonize a religion of over a billion adherents. One book he wrote, co-authored with the above mentioned Pamella Geller, titled "The Post American Presidency: The Obama Administration's War on America," received a forward written in it by notorious war monger, PNAC signatory, and Council on Foreign Relations member, John Bolton.

John Bolton doesn't just settle for writing forwards for opportunistic propagandists like Pam Geller and Robert Spencer, he also gives them exclusive interviews.




That John Bolton and Daniel Pipes of the Council on Foreign Relations, and participants in the various pre-9/11 pro-war PNAC publications are constantly turning up in propaganda films like "Obsession," and behind war propaganda clearing houses like "Jihad Watch" and "Atlas Shrugs" engenders serious suspicion due to an equally serious conflict of interest.

Understand that these men are direct beneficiaries, perhaps the only beneficiaries of the endless war that has resulted from 9/11 and the threat of their manufactured "radical Islam." It is in their best interest to keep the fear, the hatred and the resulting "clash of civilizations" going on as long as possible/profitable.

Victims of Pipes, Spencer, Bolton, Geller, and Horowtiz's cartoonish war propaganda need to remember it is the Department of Homeland Security dismantling the Bill of Rights, not Al Qaeda. It is the bankers and globalists flooding America with immigrants, preventing Americans from defending their borders and enacting free trade collapsing America's economy. The Council on Foreign Relations wrote "Building a North American Community," not bearded men, wearing turbans and hiding in caves. And if anyone comes to the realization that 9/11 is indeed an inside job, then the game these modern day propagandists are playing becomes all the more transparent, and people listening to them - their anger ever more misdirected.

These men, like Hitler, appealing to the most ignorant in society, plan on leading the nations of the world into yet another suicidal war, from which only they will benefit from. Remember, the dividers, the globalists, they are the enemy.

In closing, here is a link to an interview, part of David Horowitz' "Freedom Center" activities featuring David Horowitz, CFR Daniel Pipes, and CFR John Bolton during a Q&A session. These globalist creatures, their demeanor, their making fun of violence they have stoked but are safely removed from as they giggle, speaks for itself.