Blind Chinese Activist is US NED Proxy

Strategy of Tension: West Creates Eugenics Nightmare in China - then Celebrates Activists Fighting It.
by Tony Cartalucci 

April 28, 2012 - Anytime the Western media becomes ecstatic over the activities of a so-called "rights advocate," it is almost certain that they are either backed by convicted criminal, Wall Street speculator George Soros, or a recipient of US State Department-funded National Endowment for Democracy (NED) funds and support, or both. In the case of China's Chen Guangcheng, allegedly blind and having recently escaped from house arrest in a rural Chinese town, it didn't take long to trace his ties back to the US State Department's National Endowment for Democracy.

Image: A visual representation of the National Endowment for Democracy's corporate-financier ties found across their Board of Directors. Far from "human rights advocates," they are in fact amongst the most vicious warmongers and violators of such rights - simply leveraging such issues to disguise what is in reality corporate-financier hegemonic expansion.

....

NED's "Democracy Digest" celebrated Guangcheng's "activism" and his use of "social media tools" in their 2011 article titled, "‘Extraordinary’ campaign for barefoot lawyer Chen Guangcheng." Democracy Digest reveals that fake-Christian charity front ChinaAid and propaganda outlet China Digital Times, who have been Gunagcheng's primary backers, are both NED grantees and that Guangcheng himself was the recipient of NED's 2008 "Democracy Award." This award has been more recently given to NED's proxies used during the US-engineered "Arab Spring."

 

 

Images: Top - 2008's "Democracy Awards" presented to representatives of Chen Guangcheng. Bottom - In late 2011, Egyptian and Tunisian proxies receive their awards for helping the West topple sovereign governments and install client regimes - Tunisia in particular now sports a NED-funded "activist leader" as president.

....

Also mentioned in Democracy Digest's article is the name of Council on Foreign Relations member Jerome Cohen as a "witness." Cohen, of course, is providing "pro-bono" legal aid from the Council on Foreign Relations lined, Soros-funded "Freedom Now" organization for various dupes, stooges, and proxies of Wall Street and London. Readers may remember "Freedom Now" from their extensive involvement in supporting the Syrian opposition who triggered the current unrest now plaguing Syria, as well as being backers of Wall Street and London's proxy in Myanmar (Burma), Aung San Suu Kyi. Freedom Now is also currently backing a leading Bahraini activist, Abdulhadi al-Khawaja, who was regional coordinator of "Frontline Defenders," a Ford Foundation, Freedom House, American Jewish World Service, Soros Open Society Institute-funded "human rights" advocacy group. Al-Khawaja is now carrying out a "hunger strike" while in prison - part of a grander strategy to keep neighboring despotic regimes Saudi Arabia and Qatar loyal to the West's agenda.

Image: Freedom Now's corporate and foundation sponsors revealing that it, like so many others, is yet another Fortune 500 front carrying out the agenda of the monied elite under the guise of "humanitarian concerns." 

....

Freedom Now also backs a number of other Chinese proxies including Nobel Laureate and "human rights activist" Liu Xiaobo and Gao Zhisheng, both of whom are used to leverage the issues of human rights to undermine nationalist elements of China's government while asserting the primacy of "international law" and the West's "civil society" overlay across the vast East Asian nation-state.
  
"Blind Activist" Rails Against Policies of his Western Backers' Creation

What makes the "blind activist" Chen Guangcheng different is that he has been allegedly fighting against China's abhorrent population control methods, including forced sterilizations and abortions to maintain China's draconian "one child policy." The catch of course is, the corporate-financier oligarchs backing Guangcheng's activism are also the architects of China's population control programs in the first place, supported, defended, and whitewashed fully by the United Nations (see also here, and here), and even gloried in excruciating detail in current White House science adviser John P. Holdren's 1,000+ page book, "Ecoscience."

Indeed, the very practices carried out in China today were pioneered by Western corporate-funded foundations and government agencies like USAID's forced-sterilization program in Peru during the late 90's and the Carnegie Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation's work in founding the Nazi's eugenics cult, including the program Nazi war criminal Josef Mengele worked in before moving to the infamous Auschwitz death camp.

China's brutal population control policies have been praised and lauded by people like Ted Turner who said during an interview with Diane Rehm (well worth listening to) that the Chinese "wisely instituted a one child policy" which he believes isn't "draconian."

Worst of all, is the gushing admiration David Rockefeller himself has shown for Maoism and the genocidal "great leap forward" that killed at least 45 million in 4 years, and up to 80 million in all. Rockefeller noted in a New York Times article titled "From a China Traveler" in 1973 that “The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.” He considers the resulting policies "social innovations."

The fact that David Rockefeller founded and chairs the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a globalist forum of which nearly all of America's most influential politicians are members of and from which nearly all of America's policy originates from, constituting the collective interests of Wall Street and London's corporate-financier elite, are the very people now supporting Guangcheng's "activism" reveals astounding hypocrisy perhaps so gargantuan its full shape fails to come into focus for most.

Indeed, the West's support for Guangcheng isn't because they believe the eugenics programs they have carefully constructed, meticulously propagated, and brutally claimed the lives of tens of millions with is now suddenly bad, but rather because Guangcheng represents a convenient point of leverage from which to undermine the Chinese government regarding an unpopular program the West itself has engineered. Feeding off of the warranted and legitimate backlash against China's population control programs may be the loose shingle the West can use to blow the rest of the roof off - where concerns over "democracy" and "civil society" have fallen flat.

China's best response would be to withdraw from its obligations at the UN and replace its unpopular population control policies with technical education, research and development and other pragmatic industry and technologically-based, rather than policy-based solutions to deal with China's large population.

Meanwhile, the West continues to openly announce their intentions of encircling China, containing its military and economic rise, as it sabotages sovereignty and economic prosperity along its peripheries and destabilizes its economic partners across all of Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia. The latest manifestation of this policy comes to us from US Army Chief of Staff, General Raymond Odierno who eagerly parrots talking points being peddled by the US State Department, which in turn are nearly decade-old plans drawn from corporate-funded think-tanks long planning to sabotage the rise of Asia and maintain another century of Western led global hegemony.

Complete Course in Food & Population Control as a Weapon

SOMALIA: FAMINE FOR PROFIT AND THE EAST AFRICAN FOOD CRISIS

Written by Nile Bowie

Photographed by James Nachtwey

Few parts of the world aptly fit the description of hell better than Somalia’s crumbling capital city, Mogadishu; a nation ravaged by imperialism, domestic instability and economic sabotage from foreign forces. Parades of malnourished Africans queuing up to receive rations are trumpeted in thirty second news pieces on most mainstream media outlets, of which offer embarrassingly insubstantial examples of journalism with little explanation for such images of unparalleled inequality, past the effects of droughts, while never missing the opportunity to highlight the threat of al-Qaeda. While it cannot be denied that the current droughts in East Africa, which have been reported to be the most dire in sixty years, have been negatively exacerbating the climate of food availability in Somalia, Kenya and Ethiopia; the mammoth aid conglomerates which ‘shake their coin cup’ for incoming donations from the predominately cash-strapped civilian populations of the ‘developed’ world and the reporting mainstream media outlets consistently fail to maturely scrutinize the basis for such economic dysfunction in East Africa, responsible for the starvation of thousands of people. In Somalia’s case (a nation once self sufficient in it’s food production), the ‘economic medicine’ of the International Monetary Fund and the behest of colossal oil robber-barrens have contributed far more devastation than droughts towards producing the images of deprived and inebriated bodies you see on television.

While a percentage of people around the world enjoy the supersized culture of fast food Globalization in our age of 3D HDTV, quadruple-decker cheese burgers and senseless commodity overproduction, three billion people or nearly half the world’s population individually sustain themselves on less than two USD per day amidst an annual surge in the global price of food, which has increased by thirty seven percent since last year. The loathsomely bias individuals which comprise the International Community, of whom are capable of feeding the entire African content with the loose change in their couch cushions, use today’s reports of legitimate or fabricated human rights abuses in Africa and all over the world as a pretext for exercising avenues of modern imperial conquest in the morally bankrupt pursuit of private geopolitical, economic and militarily strategic gain; this should lend serious credence to the motivations of East African aid supplied by Western Political & Financial Institutions, which have contributed to the very economic genocide responsible for requiring such aid to begin with. The area designated as modern day Somalia is a region believed to have produced the first Homo sapiens, who were responsible for crafting vast anthropological treasures and archeological artifacts, evidence of a highly sophisticated ancient civilization. The region once thrived as a bustling hub of commerce and lucrative international trade, Somali merchants of the time were chieftains of commercial exchange between Asia, Persia and Africa during the time of the Ming Dynasty and were even responsible for influencing Chinese linguistics during the period. Today, the people of Somalia are regarded as little more than ants at a picnic for the Intelligence Agencies and Corporate Interests that seek to occupy this strategically located area. The weapon of choice against them is man made famine.

Read the rest of this amazing breakdown, including a history of population control, the criminal consolidation of our food supply, and shocking admissions from our "leaders" regarding the absolute contempt they view humanity with, at Nile Bowie's blog.

The Last Word on Overpopulation

James Corbett
The Corbett Report
15 February, 2011

Abortion is Killing

Science says so.
by Tony Cartalucci

This is a human being. It has a quantifiable human genetic code
and independent, self-perpetuating cellular metabolic activity that will
continue from the moment of conception to 80 years of age watching
their grandchildren play on their front lawn. Science says so. (Credit:
iStockphoto/Chris Downie)

Abortion is not a Moral Issue

Abortion is not a religious issue and it is not a moral issue. It is not a social issue, it is not a personal, or an ethical issue. It is entirely a matter of science - human biology in particular - and no amount of denial or cognitive dissonance, justification or moral arguments can help one escape from the implications of examining abortion from a scientific point of view.

Abortion is an intentionally divisive issue, used to cleave society in half rendering perpetual, circular debate. Considering the finality that biology lends to the debate, it becomes quite clear then, why biology is rarely brought up in any "pro-life/pro-choice" argument. It is yet another false paradigm where two inadequate arguments are intentionally perpetuated by the corporate-owned globalist media on both sides, ensuring a real solution or consensus is never reached. Abortion then becomes a useful tool to derail or distract in nearly any political debate, even one involving unprecedented global larceny and the collapse of the West.

Biology 101

At the moment of conception there is a quantifiable, unique human genetic code present along with independent, perpetuating cellular metabolic activity. Both can be examined and measured, both are indisputable conditions resulting from conception. This human genetic code, and the cellular activity that it directs continues in a linear, uninterrupted process from conception, to birth, through childhood, into adulthood and onto natural death from old age. The genetic code and cellular activity that exists at conception will continue to exist until that individual is 80 years old watching their grandchildren play on their front lawn.

In other words, life - as measurable by science - begins at conception.

There is no observable, quantifiable point, no "magic moment" between conception and birth where one "becomes human" or "begins life" beyond the most superficial, contrived measurements. Attempts such as noting the development of the nervous system are entirely arbitrary with proponents of such superficial measures unable to explain scientifically or quantify what this "mass of tissue" is before such measurements deem one human. Generally these arguments are peddled by those either entirely ignorant of human biology, or by those intentionally preying on those with an inadequate understanding of human biology.

Viability: Another popular metric used to determine one's "human-ness" is viability. Again, this is entirely arbitrary and superficial. A new born is no more viable than they were at the moment of conception - entirely dependent on others for the delivery of nutrients to their body and protection from the surrounding environment. Additionally, technology negates the vulnerability of not only babies who are born prematurely at increasingly earlier terms, but the ability for a conceived human to be transplanted from one uterus to another. Inevitably, technology will make it possible to raise a human from conception to infancy entirely in vitro.

"It's Your Body": No doctor or scientist could agree with this sophomoric statement. Every single part of "your body" contains your DNA. This is why DNA testing is used to determine the identity of victims of fatal circumstances who have been reduced beyond superficial recognition. At the moment of conception however, an entirely unique human genetic code is present. It is in no shape, form, or way a part of the mother's body, it is simply residing within it. In fact, evolution necessarily developed mechanisms to protect the developing child from the maternal immune system. Without such a mechanism, the maternal immune system would identify the child as a foreign body and attack it - because it is a foreign body.

Terminating a pregnancy is not removing unwanted features of "your body," but removing the developing body of another human being. Abortion is literally killing a genetically unique, living human being.

Humanity Reduced to Ignorant Superficiality: Often cited as the number one reason why abortion and fetal stem cell research is not killing human life is, "it's just a clump of cells." Such an ignorant statement is made not because those who say it understand the seven conditions that describe life or have examined genetically this "clump" but merely because it superficially doesn't resemble what they intuitively consider life.

This is analogous to arguments based on similar "intuitive observations" that the earth was flat or that the universe was geocentric. Just as the earth appears flat when standing on it, despite being spherical in reality, so too does a human zygote appear but a "clump of cells" when in reality it is a living human being. To those at the mercy of their intuitive, ignorant understanding of the world, if it doesn't have two hands, two eyes, and look familiar, it "must not be human life." This is the result of an undeveloped, ignorant mind incapable of grasping or visualizing anything beyond the most simplistic concepts. We are still struggling to move past racism based on the same sort of elementary superficial prejudice and so it is no surprise that the basic idea of humanity itself has been reduced to such ignorant superficiality.

Conclusion

One may attempt to argue ethically or morally that killing a human life in utero has beneficial social implications, but one cannot argue they are not killing a human life. At the end of the day, the "pro-choice" argument is just as irrational, superficial, arbitrary, and baseless as they claim religiously motivated "pro-life" arguments are. In the case of abortion, science sides with the religiously motivated, even if they themselves don't realize it or are unable to wrap their minds around this convenient fact. Capitalizing on the science behind abortion not only ends this non-debate, it forces both "pro-choicers" to defend their arbitrary belief system against hard science, while it gives rational grounding to the beliefs of many in the "pro-life" camp.

Science, as it turns out, has a tendency to side with the more universally common aspects of most religions, because religion itself is based on recorded observations of human sociology, even human sociobiology, over thousands of years. As a social species, we have developed sociobiological tendencies that are conducive to cooperation, empathy, and social harmony. It was the key to our success as a species just as sociobiological tendencies have been the key to the success of wolves, lions, apes, and other social species. This is what has become our "morality," and again, giving it a scientific context eliminates the circular discussions and the rampant nihilism that is consuming and impeding our success as a species today.

The wanton dehumanization of our unborn is not conducive to cooperation, empathy, or social harmony. It invites irrational justifications to commit harm to our own species, specifically to members of our species we deem as "undesirable." This slippery slope has been fallen down before, and one should need not be reminded the final results.

The slippery slope of justifying the dehumanization and
riddance of those we deem "undesirable" ends here.

While surely an unexpectant mother is inconvenienced, her social viability itself potentially put at jeopardy, with her ability to properly raise the child even if she wanted to in question, justifying the killing of human beings, through a campaign of superficial, unscientific dehumanization is not the answer. If there are trillions to give to degenerate, speculating bankers, and trillions more to feed corporate wars, then there is also money to develop the technology to take unwanted children off the hands of those who don't want them, and into the hands of those that will raise them - giving them, as we have been given, a chance to learn, explore, and experience the trials of life for all its ups and downs. Surely of all the inalienable human rights we supposedly have, this is the most basic.

Note: Abortion is illegal in Thailand, where the Land Destroyer Report is based in. There are many orphanages and if you are ever in the area, you are more than welcome to assist us in supporting local orphans.

Welcome to the Prison Planet

The Debate is Over

by Tony Cartalucci

This is a real video found on "the Forum for the Future" website. There are three other "possibilities" also featured, all promoting "low carbon" lifestyles.

Some of the largest corporations on earth have signed on as partners of the "Forum for the Future." What might first appear as just another special interest lobbyist group, pushing a corporate agenda masquerading as a humanitarian cause, is actually the coup de grace, the globalist "end game" laid out for all to see.

The seemingly innocuous cartoon with its disarming music, features the future of the human race, confined in cities built by central planning, food rationing, the end of intercity travel, allocated slots on public transportation, allocated jobs, allocated housing, and just about every other aspect of corporate fascism, communism, socialism, Orwellian police state society, the Brave New World, and every other tyranny real or imagined cobbled together into one nightmarish and very real goal.

While three other possibilities are also featured, none remotely as terrifying as the one above, they seem less likely considering their divergence from the very real UN Agenda 21, a program of literally moving people off their land, and having them converge inside tightly controlled cities.

The Prototype and Piecemeal Progress

Further proof that "Planned-opolis" is the design of choice is the fact that it isn't something you have to wait for, the prototype already exists at the tip of the Malaysia Peninsula upon the island republic of Singapore. Described as "The Singapore Solution" by National Geographic, Singapore has achieved in one generation its booming metropolis with soaring towers, an efficient mass transportation system, safe streets, and relatively low unemployment through a system of draconian central planning under a single party system.

National Geographic proposes the following question: "What price prosperity and security? Are they worth living in a place that many contend is a socially engineered, nose-to-the-grindstone, workaholic rat race, where the self-perpetuating ruling party enforces draconian laws (your airport entry card informs you, in red letters, that the penalty for drug trafficking is "DEATH"), squashes press freedom, and offers a debatable level of financial transparency?"

National Geographic, and very obviously the Forum for the Future seems to argue, yes, social engineering and the suspension of your inalienable human rights are more than acceptable to ensure their idea of a well-oiled society is realized.

Take another look at the "partners" section of the Forum for the Future. What sort of planned city do you think would benefit the interests of Royal Dutch Shell, Cargill, or Bank of America? The goals of the Club of Rome and the UN's Agenda 21 have long been denied by the mainstream media, including Reuters and Time Warner's CNN, but something is changing.

The program for global government, the systematic dismantling of traditional human society, and the creation of a socially engineered, electronically controlled humanity is being openly sold to the public. It has been piecemeal laid into place on the back of wars, staged terrorism, the fraud that is "global warming," financial collapse, and the coming wars and cold wars waged against rising states.

One can only imagine the implements of tyranny that will be developed during an ensuing stand-off between the West and China or war with Iran. One can only imagine how alluring any job or home will be, allocated or not, following the collapse of America's dollar or the bursting of China's housing bubble, or any number of collapses the ponzi-globalist system seems prone to create.

Conclusion

Humanity's inalienable human rights are non-negotiable. For America, these rights are enshrined in the Bill of Rights, but were existent long before the Founding Fathers put quill to parchment and are applicable not just to Americans, but to all of humanity. No crisis, no threat, no philosophical argument can undermine, usurp or side-step these human rights. Furthermore, central planning, rationing, socialism are not solutions to any given problem, but rather stop-gaps at best. It is technology, education, innovation, and exploration that solve problems permanently.

Prehistoric man didn't emerge from the ice age because of careful rationing, socialist policies, or central planning, they did so by inventing better spears and hunting techniques. They further weathered food shortages and overpopulation by developing agricultural technology and exploring new climbs and places to settle. That is how we will successfully weather the challenges we face today, through innovation, technological progress, education, and the exploration of new climbs and place, including space travel and colonization.

Those that would deny you this future and confine you in a "planned city" within which they control your very destiny, seek to deny you your humanity. They do so not for the benefit of mankind or the planet, but to feed their insatiable megalomania. One only needs to consider Forum for the Future sponsor, Bank of America's "foreclosure frenzy" in which they were literally stealing homes from people who had fully paid for them, or fellow sponsor Royal Dutch Shell, one of the greatest purveyors of real environmental and humanitarian devastation in, amongst other places, Nigeria. These are businessmen, bankers, propagandists and polluters, already plaguing the world with their complete disregard for the environment or humanity. Would confining humanity to corporate sponsored "planned-cities" be offering a solution to the world's problems, or eliminating the possibility of anyone ever solving them?

For more on the Forum for the Future and their proposed "prison cities," visit Infowars.com.

Ukrainian People Say No to Globalist Vaccines

The Power of Boycotting

By Tony Cartalucci

The latest supporting evidence that Zbigniew Brzezinski fears of a "global awakening" were well founded comes in the form of a vaccine boycott in Ukraine.

According to the Associated Press report, "Vaccine scare in Ukraine threatens health:"

"Hundreds of thousands of fearful Ukrainians have refused vaccines for diseases such as diphtheria, mumps, polio, hepatitis B, tuberculosis, whooping cough and others this year, according to official estimates. Authorities have canceled a U.N.-backed measles and rubella vaccination campaign funded by U.S. philanthropist Ted Turner, and will have to collect and incinerate nearly 9 million unused doses in coming months."

AP then tries to hint that Ukrainian media was irresponsibly misleading people:

"Ukrainian media outlets are numerous and uncensored but do not widely follow Western standards of fairness and accuracy. Some print and online reports alleged after the boy's death that the Indian-made measles and rubella vaccine would sterilize men as part of a plot by Ted Turner, whose Washington-based United Nations Foundation charity paid for the vaccines."

Apparently AP's concept of Western standards of fairness and accuracy is hiding the global elites' Malthusian mantra of "we're too many people" or the century long, eugenic campaign of sterilizing, infecting, and outright killing the masses.

Ted Turner says there's too many people, now he wants you to take his "vaccines."

Associated Press doesn't miss a beat between their feigned puzzlement over the Ukrainians' refusal to roll up their sleeves for Ted Turner's vaccines, and reporting the US Government's admission of purposefully infecting hundreds of Guatemalans during secret experiments in the 1940's. In this second report, AP also reminds us of the Tuskegee Experiment where hundreds of black Americans were secretly experimented on and lied to about their true condition and denied real treatment.

Globalists try to cure the world of "useless eaters."

What AP claims international health officials call "unwarranted and dangerous" fears, seem quite warranted and only dangerous to the globalists' agenda when put into a proper, historical context.

A Sampling of Historical Context

There was the covert forced sterilization of 200,000-300,000 Peruvian women as recently as 2000, under the watch of the UN and USAID. USAID to this day is still involved in "family planning" in Peru. There is also the quite public population reduction program of China, praised and lauded by people like Ted Turner who said during an interview with Diane Rehm (well worth listening to) that the Chinese "wisely instituted a one child policy" which he believes isn't "draconian."

Worst of all, is the gushing admiration globalist patriarch David Rockefeller has shown for Maoism and the genocidal "great leap forward" that killed at least 45 million in 4 years, and up to 80 million in all. Rockefeller noted in a New York Times article titled "From a China Traveler" in 1973 that “The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.” He considers the resulting policies "social innovations."

The fact that David Rockefeller founded and chairs the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a globalist forum of which nearly all of America's politicians are members of and from which all of America's policy originates from, should give us all pause for thought before rolling up our sleeves for anything they have to hand out.

The Bottom Line

The constant din of the globalist mass media under CFR corporations like Time Warner and News Corporation's Fox News, or Chatham House's BBC, guided by the agenda of globalist mainstays like Ted Turner, Bill Gates, and White House Science Adviser John Holdren, is thankfully being sidelined by the common sense and awakening of the people.

The Ukrainians seem to understand the implications of a ruling elite that worship mass murdering genocidal megalomaniacs and how the sound science and noble intentions of vaccinations have been hijacked by them to carry on the "social innovations" of Mao.

The people of Ukraine didn't wait for their government and elected officials to take action. They took action themselves by boycotting the globalist's agenda, en-mass and forcing the destruction of whatever Ted Turner had filled those 9 million injections with by simply not consuming what was placed in the trough by the globalists.

There is a great lesson to be learned here: Boycotts work, and perhaps the only vote you have that really counts is how you choose to spend your money, who you pay your attention to, and who you place your trust in, be it food, water, medicine, education, or the news.

So again, boycott the globalists, their corporations, their propaganda networks, their sleazy nihilistic entertainment, and their system in general. There is nothing they offer globally that we can't do better locally. Our future, our lives depend on it.

Conclusive: Global Distribution of Rockefeller-Funded Anti-Fertility Vaccine Coordinated by WHO

Editing Note:

Essential article on covert population reduction conducted by the Rockefeller Foundation since the 1960's.

http://www.infowars.com/conclusive-global-distribution-of-rockefeller-funded-anti-fertility-vaccine-coordinated-by-who/

For more information, please see End Game, linked at the end of this article.

Jurriaan Maessen
Infowars.com
Thursday, August 5, 2010

In its 1968 yearly report, the Rockefeller Foundation acknowledged funding the development of so-called “anti-fertility vaccines” and their implementation on a mass-scale. From page 51 onward we read:

“(…) several types of drugs are known to diminish male fertility, but those that have been tested have serious problems of toxicity. Very little work is in progress on immunological methods, such as vaccines, to reduce fertility, and much more research is required if a solution is to be found here.”

The possibility of using vaccines to reduce male fertility was something that needed to be investigated further, according to the Rockefeller Foundation, because both the oral pill and the IUD were not suitable for mass-scale distribution:

“We are faced with the danger that within a few years these two “modern” methods, for which such high hopes have been held, will in fact turn out to be impracticable on a mass scale.”

The possibility of administrating hormone preparations to reduce fertility was also mentioned, although- states the report- they have been known to “cause bleeding problems, which may limit their usefulness.”

“A semipermanent or renewable subcutaneous implant of these hormones has been suggested, but whether or not the same difficulties would result has not been determined.”

Saying that research thus-far had been too low-grade to produce any substantial results, the report was adamant:

“The Foundation will endeavour to assist in filling this important gap in several ways:

1- “Seeking out or encouraging the development of, and providing partial support to, a few centres of excellence in universities and research institutions in the United States and abroad in which the methods and points of view of molecular biology are teamed with the more traditional approaches of histology, embryology,and endocrinology in research pertinent to development of fertility control methods;”

2- “Supporting research of individual investigators, oriented toward development of contraceptive methods or of basic information on human reproduction relevant to such developments;”

3- “Encouraging, by making research funds available, as well as by other means, established and beginning investigators to turn their attention to aspects of research in reproductive biology that have implications for human fertility and its control;”

4- “Encouraging more biology and biochemistry students to elect careers in reproductive biology and human fertility control, through support of research and teaching programs in departments of zoology, biology, and biochemistry.”

The list goes on and on. Motivation for these activities, according to the RF?

“There are an estimated five million women among America’s poverty and near-poverty groups who need birth control service (…). The unchecked fertility of the indigent does much to perpetuate poverty, undereducation, and underemployment, not only in urban slums, but also in depressed rural areas.”

It wasn’t long before all the Foundation’s efforts began to have effect. In its annual report of 1988, The RF was happy to report the progress made by the Foundation’s Population Division in the field of anti-fertility vaccines:

“India’s National Institute of Immunology successfully completed in 1988 the first phase of trials with three versions of an anti-fertility vaccine for women. Sponsored by the government of India and supported by the Foundation, the trials established that with each of the tested vaccines, at least one year of protection against pregnancy could be expected, based on the levels of antibodies formed in response to the immunization schedule.”

In its 1997 review of anti-fertility vaccines, Indian based International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology didn’t forget to acknowledge its main benefactor:

“The work on LHRH and HCG vaccines was supported by research grants of The Rockefeller Foundation, (…).”

In the 1990s the work on anti-fertility vaccines went in overdrive, especially in third-world nations, as did the funding provided by the deep pockets of the Rockefeller Foundation. At the same time, the target-population of the globalists- women- began to stir uncomfortably with all this out-in-the-open talk of population reduction and vaccines as a means to achieve it.

Betsy Hartman, Director of the Population and Development Program at Hampshire College, Massachusetts and “someone who believes strongly in women’s right to safe, voluntary birth control and abortion”, is no supporter of the anti-fertility vaccine, as brought into being by the Rockefeller Foundation. She explains in her essay Population control in the new world order:

“Although one vaccine has been tested on only 180 women in India, it is being billed there as ‘safe, devoid of any side effects and completely reversible’. The scientific community knows very well that such assertions are false – for instance, many questions still remain about the vaccine’s long-term impact on the immune system and menstrual cycle. There is also evidence on film of women being denied information about the vaccine in clinical trials. Nevertheless, the vaccine is being prepared for large-scale use.”

The Women’s Global Network for Reproductive Rights based in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, quoted “a leading contraceptive researcher as saying:

“Immunological birth control methods will be an ‘antigenic weapon’ against the reproductive process, which left unchecked, threatens to swamp the world.”

Animal rights activist ms. Sonya Ghosh also expressed concerns about the Rockefeller-funded anti-fertility vaccine and its implementation:

“Instead of giving individual women more options to prevent pregnancy and protect against AIDs and sexually transmitted diseases, the anti fertility vaccine is designed to be easily administered to large numbers of women using the least resources. If administered to illiterate populations the issues of user control and informed consent are further cause for concern.”

To avoid such debates, the Foundation has in the last couple of decades consorted to its long-practised and highly successful methods of either outright lying through its teeth or using deceptive language to hide the fact that it continues to work tirelessly toward its long-stated mission. If you think the RF and others have abandoned their anti-fertility efforts with the help of vaccines, think again or read this article.

Establishment Media Pushes Brain Eating Vaccines

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Tuesday, August 3, 2010

The establishment media and the scientific dictatorship are promoting brain-eating vaccines that virtually lobotomize people and rewire their brains into a state of subservient compliance so that their natural instinct to get angry and rebel against the tyranny being imposed upon them is neutered and sterilized.

“Academics say they are close to developing the first vaccine for stress – a single jab that would help us relax without slowing down,” reports the Daily Mail.

Dr Robert Sapolsky, professor of neuroscience at Stanford University in California, says the vaccine is intended to impose a state of “focused calm” by altering brain chemistry.

The new research dovetails with proposals to add lithium to the water supply in order to treat “mood disorders”.

People globally are already being bombarded with sodium fluoride, a cancer causing neurotoxin, through the water supply, toothpaste, and many foods.

The first occurrence of fluoridated drinking water on Earth was found in Germany’s Nazi prison camps. The Gestapo had little concern about fluoride’s supposed effect on children’s teeth; their alleged reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to sterilize humans and force the people in their concentration camps into calm submission.

Infowars is promoting a new viral Google search term in order to attract much needed attention to this grave issue.

Search for “brain eating vaccines” and by elevating this term to the top of Google Trends, we can reach millions of new people who would otherwise have never come across this information.

Find the whole article on Prison Planet here.